Skip to content
Subscribe

Another War on Drugs? Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Calls AG Plan Outdated and Ineffective

Another War on Drugs? Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Calls AG Plan Outdated and Ineffective
Published:

Last week's memo released by Attorney General Jeff Sessions may place him in direct conflict with public opinion as well as a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers.

The memo directs federal prosecutors to seek the harshest sentences possible when prosecuting federal cases and also signals a formal withdrawal from a signature aspect of Obama era Attorney General Eric Holder's "Smart on Crime" initiative, which "sought to target the most serious crimes and reduce the number of defendants charged with non-violent drug offenses that would otherwise trigger mandatory minimum sentences." This reversal of Obama era policy could have significant impact on those charged with the possession of marijuana.

This comes at a time when public support for legalizing marijuana is up to 60%, according to Gallup. Legalization enjoys the highest favorability among Democrats and Independents, however, Republicans' support has doubled from more than a decade ago. Additionally, a 2015 Public Policy Polling survey, found that a majority of Republicans favor states' rights to legislate their own marijuana use without federal interference.

In February, Rep. Thomas Garrett (R-Va.) introduced H.R. 1227, ending Federal Marijuana Prohibition Act of 2017, along with Reps Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), Scott Taylor (R-Va.), and Jared Polis (D-Colo.).

The bipartisan bill would allow states to fully dictate medical and recreational marijuana policy without risk of intervention by the federal government. The legislation has gained popularity, and now boasts 11 cosponsors, including both Republicans and Democrats. It has been referred to several committees so far, including the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.

Friday, Gabbard took to Twitter to express her discontent with Sessions' apparent ramping up of the War on Drugs. She calls for "#criminaljusticereform now" and claims that "AG Sessions' discriminatory memo on sentencing takes things in the wrong direction." Gabbard then called for Congress to pass H.R. 1227 as a step toward ending what many have come to view as a flawed War on Drugs.

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/863184419170861056

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/863184617540534272

Others have been critical of Sessions' memo, including former Attorney General Holder, who stated:

"The policy announced today is not tough on crime. It is dumb on crime. It is an ideologically motivated, cookie-cutter approach that has only been proven to generate unfairly long sentences that are often applied indiscriminately and do little to achieve long-term public safety."

Additionally, Rand Paul (R-KY), who has been a surprising ally of Gabbard, published an op-ed Monday on CNN decrying the move as:

"...a reversal of a policy that was working,  will accentuate the injustice in our criminal justice system. We should be treating our nation's drug epidemic for what it is -- a public health crisis, not an excuse to send people to prison and turn a mistake into a tragedy."

Lawmakers across the political spectrum are coming out against the War on Drugs, which has come to the forefront of progressive discourse recently. This can in part be attributed to increased awareness on the issue, following the release of the award winning Netflix documentary, 13th, which focuses on the propensity of the criminal justice system to target minorities and the poor, which in turn, contributes to prison overcrowding with low level drug offenders.

Rep. Gabbard's ability to work across the aisle as well as to buck traditional establishment narratives, has allowed her to gain respect from progressives and Trump supporters alike. Are they listening to her calls now?

Image Source: Flickr.com / Tulsi Gabbard

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Another War on Drugs? Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Calls AG Plan Outdated and Ineffective

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us