Skip to content
Subscribe

\Battleground California\ Pits Democrat vs. Democrat

\Battleground California\ Pits Democrat vs. Democrat
Published:

Team Sherman and Team Berman volunteers campaigning outside the Convention Center in San Diego, Feb. 11. Photo Credit: Benjamin Wong, IVN

Berman_vs_Sherman

Rep. Brad Sherman and Rep. Howard Berman butted heads this weekend at the California Democratic Convention, both vying for the Democratic endorsement for the 30th congressional district. Due to California's newly redistricted maps, both candidates forfeited the advantage of incumbency and are now fighting against one another to represent the newly defined San Fernando Valley district.

And despite cries from the Republican Party, the California Supreme Court upheld the legality of the Senate district lines drawn by the California New Citizens Redistricting Commission. So we're left with one district, two Democrats.

Volunteers for both campaigns rallied outside the Convention Center in San Diego, chanting for their favored candidates, holding campaign posters, and handing out flyers and letters. Of all the Sherman/Berman paraphernalia handed out, most surprising was a letter handed to me by a teen volunteer.  In the memo, member of the State Board of Equalization Betty Yee took on a harsh tone as she urged the Democratic Delegates to cast their vote for Howard Berman. The first line read:

"It would be insane, self-destructive, and wrong…horribly wrong for the Democratic Party to support Brad Sherman against Howard Berman in Congressional 30."

The race turned ugly Saturday night, when the party endorsement caucus transformed into a "battleground," pitting Democratic against Democrat.

Sherman was relentless in his attacks on Berman's financial backing, noting, "My opponent's first super-PAC had a six-figure contribution from PG&E." Berman fired back, calling Sherman's attacks "slightly pathetic." John Myers of KQED News caught the full audio from the debate on tape, but what's left unseen is the disturbance that hit the room before the proceedings. He reports:

"A young man was actually chased through the conference room before the proceedings, with accusations he may have snatched a delegate ballot. The moderator later had to admonish loyalists against booing a fellow Democrat."

As the caucus came to a close, Sherman received 54% of the ballots cast, but did not hit the 60% mark needed to win the endorsement. With the new open primary system in California, this Democratic battle could continue past the June Primary into the November election. But for now, both the "-ermans" left San Diego empty-handed.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

\Battleground California\ Pits Democrat vs. Democrat

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us