Skip to content
Subscribe

Senate Candidates Muted in Lackluster Debate for Boxer's Open Seat

Senate Candidates Muted in Lackluster Debate for Boxer's Open Seat
Published:

SAN DIEGO, CALIF. - U.S. Senate candidates tried to go after each other in a televised debate held at KPBS studios in San Diego, but the moderator kept a strict debate format and refused to allow the important back-and-forth exchanges that can reveal a candidate's true demeanor and position on the issues.

Two Democrats and three Republicans debated the issues of public safety, illegal immigration, and the environment, but were often cut off by the moderator and not allowed to finish their thoughts or challenge one another.

With the primary just weeks away, and voter confusion at an all-time high, nearly a third of voters are still undecided about who to support in the U.S. Senate race. And when voters do view their ballots, they’ll see a double-sided monster with thirty-four candidates from which to choose.

The top two vote-getters in the June 7 primary, regardless of party, will advance to the November election. And it is very likely that for the first time in California’s political history, the choice will come down to two Democrats.

The front-runner is Attorney General Kamala Harris, who is comfortably ahead of Democratic U.S. Rep. Loretta Sanchez of Orange County. A poll conducted last month has Harris leading with 27 percent of the vote. The poll also showed 48 percent of voters remain undecided.

As for the issues, the candidates debated the controversial minimum wage increase for the state. Harris and Sanchez both support the plan to raise it to $15 an hour over the next six years. Republicans Tom Del Beccaro and Duf Sundheim oppose it. The attorneys are former heads of the California Republican Party.

Republican Ron Unz believes California's $15 number is too high, but would support a hike to $12 an hour. Unz ran for governor in 1994 against Pete Wilson.

The other big discussion point focused on comprehensive immigration reform, and what the best course of action should be for California.

Sanchez said, “the country needs massive reforms including an overhaul of the Visa program and increasing the numbers of Border Patrol agents.”

“Comprehensive immigration reform is the front-and-center civil rights issue of our time,” Harris noted.

She continued, “reform is critical now and it would benefit the state of California by $5 billion and 600,000 jobs.”

Republican Tom Del Beccaro took a notably different approach, saying “anything proposed that’s comprehensive will never pass.” Beccaro said he would like to see some kind of Visa reform and an immediate 90-day path to deporting illegal immigrants.

Duf Sundheim said, “there needs to be a clear path for legal status and sanctuary cities are a big mistake.” Republican Unz also supports comprehensive immigration reform.

Mail-in ballots are going out this week. Again, the top two vote-getters in the June 7 primary, regardless of party, will advance to the November election.

Photo Credit: Hayne Palmour IV / San Diego Union-Tribune

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Senate Candidates Muted in Lackluster Debate for Boxer's Open Seat

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us