Skip to content
Subscribe

California Wave: Data Privacy Bill Moves Up Despite Tech Kickback

California Wave: Data Privacy Bill Moves Up Despite Tech Kickback
Published:

In a 5-0 vote, California’s Senate Judiciary Committee passed a data privacy compromise bill, AB 375, which for the first time passes greater control of personal data and privacy to consumers. It's expected to be signed into law later this week.

California is among the first states in the nation to tackle this issue. The bill lays out a citizens' right to know what personal data is collected, who it is sold to as well as the right to take legal action against a company after a data breach. Also, it prevents price gouging; if a customer says “no” to a company’s sale of their data, they may not be refused service and any upcharge must be reasonable and “directly related to the value provided to the consumer by the consumer’s data."

The Catalyst: California Consumer Privacy Act

This pushes the California Consumer Privacy Act off the ballot after it recently gained enough signatures to secure a spot. There are stark differences between the two. The CCPA initiative prohibited a change in pricing and/or quality of services if a customer wanted their data left unsold to another entity.  The bill, AB 375, may not be as strong as the CCPA,  but its popularity is widely acknowledged to have provided the leverage needed to push lawmakers to a compromise.

“I believe that what we came up with is really good public policy. It’ll be the best privacy law in the country,” said Sen. Bob Hertzberg (D-Van Nuys) who helped craft the bill. “We’ve included the right to delete...we’ve included issues related to Cambridge Analytica, we’ve included protection of children — a number of things that are really smart about advancing privacy policy.”

This isn't the end of the road for AB 375. California's Senate Appropriations Committee will have its turn, pushing it along for a planned vote on Thursday.

John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog Privacy and Technology Project Director, says that if lawmakers don't make good time his organization will take action. “If the bill isn’t signed into law by Thursday, the initiative’s sponsors will move forward with their campaign and we will strongly support that effort," he said in a statement.

Business Complaints Fall Short

As usual, legislation and regulation lag behind technology. This move by the Committee comes after years of data breaches and sales, putting Americans' private data at risk. For example, Facebook sells it and credit scoring company Equifax just lost it, with millions of Americans suffering irreparable damage in the 2017 hack and subsequent coverup.

Industry groups, such as Google, Verizon, Facebook, and T-Mobile predictably cried foul on the landmark changes in a letter to lawmakers.

"Foundational concepts are lacking, including a clear definition of what businesses the bill covers," the letter says. "The bill would also lead to recurring pop-ups to consumers that would be desensitizing and give opportunities to hackers."

This isn’t just big news for Californians. The vote echoed through Washington as well.  As tech watchers wait for the dominos to fall, some say it'll lead all the way to the steps of the Supreme Court.  “California will get the conversation started, but I think it then becomes an ‘unfair burden’ argument for the companies. And then what'll happen is somebody will complain because they'll say, “Well, we have to do this for California, and we can’t do it differently for all 50 states.” Then another state will want more regulation too, and it'll be completely different,” said Morgan Wright an internationally recognized expert on cybersecurity cyberterrorism, identity theft, and privacy. His landmark testimony before Congress on Healthcare.gov changed how the government collected personally identifiable information. “There'll be a lawsuit, it'll get resolved at some level and hold up in the Supreme Court - the Supreme Court will say it's a federal issue because it deals in interstate commerce. And there you go.”

Let's not forget though, while AB 375 may be the ripple that creates a wave of data privacy laws starting from the western United States, Europe also has massive new right-to-privacy measures rolling in from the east. It’s a short matter of time before they both wash up on the shores of Washington.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

California Wave: Data Privacy Bill Moves Up Despite Tech Kickback

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us