Skip to content
Subscribe

Cold Shoulder in Saudi Arabia? Why We Should Care

Cold Shoulder in Saudi Arabia? Why We Should Care
Published:

While many news outlets received good political mileage Wednesday, flaunting the fact that President Obama was met at the airport in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia by a low-level official (the mayor) followed by cool, if not outright cold, negotiations -- there are underlying reasons that we should be really caring about.

What is Really in the 28-pages of the 9/11 Report?

This has always been something that has been a potential political firestorm, as 15 of the 19 hijackers during 9/11 were Saudi citizens.

While the pressure and emphasis has always been put on bin Laden's terrorist planning and organization, we've really never addressed the fact that Al-Qaeda was a popular movement within Saudi Arabia, with citizens traveling to strongholds for training and deployment.

The American people have never known exactly what our government truly knew about the Saudi government's involvement, or even if they had advanced intelligence.

The potential release of this information could severely change public opinion on a long-term, quasi-friendly ally that is geographically important to us because of their proximity to current enemies.

Congressional Bill Allowing 9/11 Victims' Families to Sue Saudi Kingdom

A 1976 federal law makes it fairly difficult for an American citizen to sue a foreign nation in American courts.

This could change if more support is gathered on a bill that would directly allow families of 9/11 victims to sue the Saudi Kingdom, members of the Royal Family, their banks, and charities.

President Obama is against such measures, while Trump, Cruz, Sanders, and Clinton all support it.

Of course, Saudi Arabian officials have threatened to pull their assets from the U.S., but many of their assets are in the form of property that would not be easily liquidated before it could be frozen by courts.

This is more than a slight irritation for the Saudis, as oil transactions worldwide are almost universally conducted in U.S. dollars. This places the House of Saud in a position where they can never really fully protect their assets from U.S. courts.

A 'New' Form of Saudi Jihadist Movement Arising

In America, we too often focus on ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Boko Haram (to a lesser extent) without really examining their roots, or even looking to newer threats.

Wahhabism, an ultra-conservative sect of Islam, has been on the rise since the 1970s and directly inspired bin Laden's Afghan jihad against the Soviet Union in the 1980's -- the very beginning of what would become Al-Qaeda.

While having some setbacks in popularity in the late 1990s through the 9/11 aftermath -- largely from government crackdowns -- the movement is now fully back in place, a populist movement within the country that the government can't control.

The more we crack down on terrorism, the more likely we will have to deal with this movement. And this can't make the House of Saud rest easily.

Let's not Forget About Oil

At this point, no oil producing country is happy with the fact that oil prices have been suppressed since late 2014.

American domestic companies are pumping to pay debt service; Russian and Iranian companies need dollars at any cost. They'd rather trade their own currency at a loss to gain dollars to stabilize their businesses and economy.

What started as a Saudi ploy to kill off newer production methods has now fully backfired on them. The longer this continues the bigger the losses they are accruing.

And while we really don't care how much money they lose, it does put strains on diplomatic relations in a region where we need every 'ally' we can get.

But Do We Really Still Need Them as an Ally?

That's the big question.

Most of the time, they realize that they tend to need us a whole lot more than we need them. But they have been on a mass weapons buying spree, becoming the largest importer of arms in the world in 2015.

While we've been busy with Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran, they've led their own intervention in the Yemeni Civil War.

Not only that, but it's widely believed that Saudi Arabia funded Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, with the understanding that they would eventually take delivery on their own off-the-shelf nukes.

At this point, they are quickly becoming a significant threat politically, economically, and militarily -- and they don't seem too interested in backing down.

While it may be expedient to poke fun at the president for a foreign policy failure by being snubbed, we really need to rethink our relationship with Saudi Arabia and not be short-sighted in only seeing the domestic political mileage.

Because like it or not, they are becoming one of our greatest threats.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Cold Shoulder in Saudi Arabia? Why We Should Care

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us