Skip to content
Subscribe

Current Electoral System Discourages Military from Participating

Current Electoral System Discourages Military from Participating
Published:

Credit: Prospect.org

Credit: Prospect.org

The United States military could quite possibly be the last nonpartisan government-controlled entity the country has. The reason for this, according to top brass, is that politics simply doesn't play a role in the military.

In fact, military members are strongly discouraged from participating in partisan political activities. The military examines its force in a variety of ways, but when it comes to politics the DoD steers clear of questioning troops about their individual political views.

One thing is certain however, military members vote in considerably higher numbers than the civilian population, and, according to Time Magazine, when they do, they tend to vote conservative. This could be one of the reasons for the spate of reports of vote tampering and fraud in the 2012 presidential election after Barrack Obama was re-elected.

According to Federal Voting Assistance Program's 2012 Post-Election Report to Congress, which examines the voting trends of the active duty military (ADM) and compares them with the civilian voting age population (CVAP), "Participation by members of the active duty military remained steady from 2008 to 2012."

While the initial participation rates for ADM appear lower than the CVAP, after adjusting for age and gender, the ADM participation rate is much higher.The report adjusts for age and gender because the military is disproportionally male and young when compared to the civilian population.

However, as with the civilian population, marriage is an important indicator of voting activity. Significantly more married military members vote, as do their spouses, when compared to unmarried military members.

Even though the number of military members casting their vote has increased, a disturbing trend has emerged. The percentage of active-duty military voters who reported not receiving their requested absentee ballot nearly doubled from 16 percent in 2008 to 29 percent in 2010, according to the Post-Election Report. The Post-Election Report details some of the reasons, but critics say that the real reason is simple: vote tampering.

It was alleged during the 2012 election season that democrats, and even the administration itself, were conspiring to keep military absentee votes from being counted because they vote conservative. While these claims have not been substantiated, it's clear that there are some serious challenges for the DoD and the FVAP to overcome.

Eric Eversole, founder and executive director of the Military Voter Protection Project says in an interview with U.S. News and World Report that "cultural hurdles" also play a part in military members not voting, and this is something that needs to be addressed as well.

"There is this idea that service members should stay out of the political process or America will not trust you," he said.

This idea echoes a blog post by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey. In June 2012, Dempsey wrote that he thought it was important to have an apolitical military, saying:

"We must understand why our military as a profession embraces political neutrality as a core value."

He added that remaining in a neutral political position was essential to keeping the trust of the American people.

"I shook my head at this," Eversole said of Dempsey's blog post. "Service members must participate in the democratic process they work to defend."

Senator John Cornyn had something to say about this, too. The Texas Republican wrote a letter to Dempsey questioning his comments and asking him to publicly encourage the military to vote.

While it's been alleged in yet more partisan bickering that the DoD has failed to provide the voting assistance that Congress requires, the more plausible reason for so many problems is that military members are not aware that assistance exists, or that assistance is available for their spouses through the FVAP, as well as problems with postal deadlines to return ballots, which range between 7 days and 22 days before election day, depending on the member's location.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Current Electoral System Discourages Military from Participating

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us