Skip to content
Subscribe

Democratic Leaders Block National Popular Vote in Oregon

Democratic Leaders Block National Popular Vote in Oregon
Published:

Legislation that would add Oregon to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is having a little trouble in the state Senate. Willamette Week reports that the Democratic Majority Leader and the Democratic Senate President refuse to hold an up-or-down vote on the current bill.

But it's the reason behind it that is interesting.

ALSO READ: National Popular Vote Compact Makes Huge Inroads in Another State

First, a little background.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement between states to give all of their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. So, if a traditionally Republican-controlled state joins the compact and the winner of the national popular vote is a Democrat, the state agrees to give all of their electoral votes to the Democratic candidate -- and vice versa.

However, the compact can only go into effect once there are enough states to hit the coveted 270 electoral majority. The current electoral count for the NPVIC is 168. Oregon would bring the number up to 175.

National popular vote legislation popped up in a number of states following the 2016 election, after Donald Trump won an electoral majority, but lost the national popular vote. Many Democrats cried foul and declared that the Electoral College system had to go. Yet NPVIC has had zero success so far in 2017 -- though legislation is still pending in a number of states.

So why are Senate Democrats holding up the bill in Oregon? Especially after it passed the State House in May?

Well, Majority Leader Ginny Burdick and Senate President Peter Courtney will not support the bill unless it refers the matter to state voters in a future election.

Burdick said a few weeks ago that she would help find a path for the current legislation, but has now taken a hardline stance against its passage in present form. Courtney has blocked NPVIC bills 3 times in the past 10 years (2009, 2013, and 2015), even though the bills passed the State House.

Some have speculated that Burdick and Courtney want it to go to the ballot because they know it will fail.

"I believe that those wanting to refer the bill to the ballot are looking for a decoy to kill the bill," says Kate Titus of Common Cause Oregon. "They know that democracy and public interest groups have no money to run a ballot campaign. This is simply a way to try to avoid passing the bill."

At this point it seems likely that the national popular vote bill will end up dying without even a committee vote in the State Senate. The legislative sessions ends on July 10.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Democratic Leaders Block National Popular Vote in Oregon

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us