Skip to content
Subscribe

SCOTUS Digital Political Ads Now Searchable

SCOTUS Digital Political Ads Now Searchable
Published:

Judge Brett Kavanaugh now proceeds to his confirmation hearing as President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court and the possible replacement for Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Advocacy groups were a step ahead of the mainstream media in their prepared and pre-titled digital political ads. Biased, partisan bios were conjured for each judge on the short list of possible nominees as well as the narrative warnings. Ad cash and domain names were secured well in advance of an announcement. No requirements for confirming information - they can go on rumors and conjecture. Some - ahem Judicial Crisis Network, filled its arsenal before Justice Kennedy's retirement.

In a bid to mop up it's  2016- presidential-campaign-Russian-disinformation-debacle, Facebook has given us a tool to get a better idea of who is publishing the political ads. The who, what, when, and where, regarding its sponsored political ads are searchable - all except the 'how.' As in, “How were these ads paid for? Specifically?” It is a common and essential question for some electoral reformers.

A few easily searchable examples:

Batting for the conservative side, The Judicial Crisis Network launched a $1.4 million  'Confirm Brett Kavanaugh' ad buy on national cable and digital platforms. JCN ran another one, #AnotherGreatJustice, which is a bio spot,  just after Justice Kennedy announced his retirement.

Demand Justice,  a left-of-center 501(c)(4)  is billed as a judicial nominee advocacy group. It was formed this year and is stacked with Clinton and Obama alumni. They’re still smarting from 2016 and shuffled together ads on Monday urging voters to “stop Trump’s SCOTUS takeover.”  According to a  New York Times article  the director of Demand Justice, Brian Fallon “said he was more than halfway to this initial fundraising goal," and said in May 2018 that he “expects to raise $10 million in its first year.”

As tech companies step up their transparency, the Federal Election Commission is still figuring out its role. A few tough spots include deciding which ad types must label themselves as political, as well as which kind of ad or even mention denotes a requirement to disclose the funding source. So while efforts have been made to tack on the word 'transparency' to the Facebook business model, still campaign messaging will find a way to skirt rules and grow using technicalities.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

SCOTUS Digital Political Ads Now Searchable

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us