Skip to content
Subscribe

Criminals or Vigilantes? The Dark Side of the Hacking Spree

Criminals or Vigilantes? The Dark Side of the Hacking Spree
Published:

When the DNC servers were hacked earlier this year, I received plenty of harassment on the IVN Facebook page, as well as elsewhere, for my opinion that leaked documents like this are a social ill and criminal action.

Sure, hacking is sexy when it takes down a political figure or uncovers some black-ops government program, but when it takes down your credit card or bank account (which I've been on the receiving end of both) it becomes clear that hacking is an activity that shouldn't be encouraged.

Now, the tables have fully turned on Republican nominee Donald Trump, with his leaked tax return with a near billion dollar loss being bounced around the internet and social media.

And I'm still against hacking, unlawfully obtaining information, or even the media's use of such things.

Don't get me wrong, I fully understand the opposite viewpoint -- and agree with many of the arguments to a degree. But I foresee a greater danger in rewarding any behavior like this because too much is at risk, on a personal and public level.

In 2014, a billion separate instances of hacking occurred, breaking all previous records. 2015 was even worse, with one-third of the total U.S. population having healthcare information hacked.

Where does it end?

The ability to hack computers isn't a skill that is learned overnight, nor is the skill used exclusively for vigilante purposes or we'd see far more public figures and politicians being felled by their illegal or embarrassing behavior.

To consider the hackers who broke into the DNC servers, foreign or domestic, a sort of 'electronic Robin Hood' is an incredible stretch of the imagination.

Even worse, it's almost mind-numbing how many people consider the material completely authentic, given that it was stolen by those with the computer savvy to change any or all of the information.

At some point, there needs to be a moratorium on the use of hacked and illegally obtained materials -- coupled with increased penalties for hacking.

Sure, we might not get our interesting tidbits of news or the government might get away with something scandalous for a while longer, but we need to stop what has become a train wreck on the information superhighway.

Because our entire lives are on that same super highway. And while most of us won't be the targets of a massive hacking job, even the inconvenience of identity theft can take years to clear up.

We need to see hacked and illegally obtained material for what it is -- evidence of a crime.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Criminals or Vigilantes? The Dark Side of the Hacking Spree

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us