Skip to content
Subscribe

In CA “R” is for iRrelevant: Dems, Unions and Moderates Are Big Winners

In CA “R” is for iRrelevant: Dems, Unions and Moderates Are Big Winners
Published:

Credit: Laist.com

Democrats win supermajority in the State Senate

California Democrats won a two-thirds majority in the State Senate as expected, but they also may appear to be about to win a supermajority in the State Assembly as well.

California’s first Open Primary produced wins across the board for moderates, as Republicans paid the price for sticking to the same hardline messaging that has steadily eroded the Party’s relevance in a state that was never in doubt for President Obama.

In fact, Republicans found themselves so out of sync with the electorate that they were reduced to one last argument with voters in the closing weeks, “vote for us to prevent the “supermajority” or they will raise your taxes.”

It didn’t work.

There are two factors behind the total Republican collapse. First and foremost, the open primary exposed their hard-right candidates to the light of a general election turnout. Second, the Democrats again proved themselves better at the fundamentals of targeting and getting out their vote.

Republicans made no effort to moderate in the face of open primary. Democrats did. Hidden under the big Democratic sweep, ironically is a even measurable moderation of the legislature. In so-called “same party contests” moderates won across the board.

The Speaker of the Assembly was the big winner on partisan terms having produced, it appears, two more wins over Republicans than generally predicted. But, he also appeared to be losing both of his highest priority races where he supported candidates challenged by other Democrats.

Candidates of both parties, who started out their campaigns by reaching out to all voters rather than to their narrow partisan base prevailed on Tuesday. Open primary rewarded and punished just as its proponents claimed it would.

The question going forward is, what happens to a Republican brand that is so hopelessly damaged that new independent registrants actually outnumber new Republican registrants and total registration has dropped below 30%?

Many partisan party activists and leaders will see this as a badge of honor and press still harder on the same accelerator that has them on the brink of oblivion. But, will the business community that has historically funded the bulk of Republican candidates follow them over the cliff?

One wouldn’t think so. But, so far … they have.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

In CA “R” is for iRrelevant: Dems, Unions and Moderates Are Big Winners

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us