Skip to content
Subscribe

It's on You, It's on All of Us to Let Voters Know They Have More Options in November

It's on You, It's on All of Us to Let Voters Know They Have More Options in November
Published:

Editor's Note: This article originally published on Medium and has been modified for publication on IVN by request of and with permission from the author.

To watch Free & Equal's presidential debate, go to the live stream on October 8, 2020 at 6pm MDT.

‍

On the eve of the first televised debate of the general election, Open the Debates has launched a Democracy Day Money Bomb to draw a critical mass of resources and energy to a simple, foundational task to legitimize our presidential election.

While the Democrats and Republicans are poised to get away with yet another staged press event for their candidates, we are making one last stand to deliver voters a more accurate glimpse of their actual ballot choices for this important election.

Here’s the deal: 76% of US voters want open debates, where all ballot-qualified candidates are given a chance to lay out their ideas, visions, and values. A full 60% say we need at least a third major party.

Two third party candidates have overcome byzantine ballot access barriers, created by the two-party duopoly itself, to secure ballot status in enough states to win the election. One of them, the Libertarian Party’s Jo Jorgensen, will appear on the ballot in all 50 states and DC.

Yet the duopoly’s official-sounding Commission on Presidential Debates, literally created by the two parties in 1987 to wrest control of the televised debates away from the nonpartisan League of Women Voters, is doing everything in its power to limit voters’ understanding of their ballot choices.

Anyone who thinks the CPD is playing the role of a neutral steward of American democracy, working to advance a public interest vision of voter education is simply not paying attention. While the CPD claims to work “for the benefit of the American electorate,” their brazen scheme to subvert the crystal clear will of the electorate for more voices and choices has been one of the single-biggest destructive forces to any notion of American democracy.

Unfortunately, their debate fraud scheme has received the full blessing and backing of the entire political and media establishment. Even the League of Women Voters, who presciently rang the alarm when they were ultimately booted out in 1988, has failed US voters in their nonpartisan voter education mission through silence and timidity. Their former president Dorothy Ridings serves as a co-chair of the corrupt CPD, and recently took to the airwaves to disingenuously give cover to their anti-democratic nonsense.

Sadly, it is up to us, a rag tag crew of volunteers and wannabe civic leaders, to let US voters know they actually do have more choices in this election. It is up to you, dear reader, to draw a line in the sand and take a stand for free and fair elections.

Here’s the good news: US voters want to be better informed. US voters believe very deeply that our elections ought to be fair, meaningful, and constructive. US voters want to see more voices and visions expressed in our political debates. So it’s actually a light lift. It’s a refreshing, cross-partisan, public interest message with very little dissent.

If enough of us pool our time, our resources, and our voices, we CAN break the sound barrier together.

That is why we are focusing on a dual goal of 1,000 donors and 1,000 volunteers.

1,000 donations at an average of $27 will mean we can on-board four organizers for the final stretch of Election 2020.

1,000 volunteers will mean we will be able to blanket small media markets with effective letters-to-the-editor and op-eds and other earned media placement to inject a nonpartisan/cross-partisan message of genuine voter education into the national conversation.

If we succeed at these goals today, it would be a newsworthy event that would draw media coverage from true public interest media.

When US voters overwhelmingly want more voices and better choices, but are being denied this obvious opportunity to hear from all 4 presidential contenders on enough ballots to win, there is a huge opening for truth tellers to set the record straight.

The truth is that this is massive domestic interference in our elections. This is an attack on any notion of US democracy. This is a shameless distortion of political reality that the two parties have gotten away with for far too long.

But we don’t have to keep letting them get away with it. This robbery in plain sight CAN be stopped. But we have to speak up loudly to do it. And we have to come together across partisan divides and across the political spectrum to effectively raise this issue up the flagpole.

We need YOU to stand with us!

Interested in specific ways you can help? Visit the original post to find out how you can get involved Today.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

It's on You, It's on All of Us to Let Voters Know They Have More Options in November

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us