Skip to content
Subscribe

Less Guns, More Butter Please

Less Guns, More Butter Please
Published:

How committed are liberals really to ending gun violence?

And do they really have the will for an exhausting spiritual and political fight to accomplish that?

If the answers are "Very!" and "Yes!" then...

I.

How much should we cut the Dept of Defense's budget?

šŸ˜‹

I'm a libertarian I like budget cuts.

50 percent?

I think 50 percent is what we should cut.

They're the most gun violence people in the world!

Using Trump's method of asking for too much so you can negotiate down to a better deal...

Which is not necessary for most normal reasonable people, so it's mostly just super obnoxious and time-wasting....

75 percent.

šŸ˜›

II.

We'll still be like five times the next biggest military!

lol

And nobody's going to come over an ocean and conquer one of the best things they've got going for them–

That America is here and alive and free, baby!

🌾🌾🌾

The only reason they have as much military as they do is probably because they're afraid of us doing that to them! 😬

You know?

Because of the insane amount of military we have.

(And because we've done it to people.)

What do we need all that for?

Seriously?

Even if they did come over.

Which they wouldn't.

But even if they did...

III.

Our civilian population is armed to the teeth with weapons they paid for out of their own pocket!

(You know instead of taking it out of your paycheck like the Dept of Defense does).

They have fought hard for their Second Amendment right to defend America. And they have fought well.

So they should be the deterrent.

That's the great compromise.

Okay you want your Second Amendment right to bear arms to defend the country if needed?

Then you have to be the one we're counting on for it.

80 percent Dept of Defense and Dept of Homeland Sec. cut.

This is for your Second Amendment rights.

IV.

Now don't get greedy liberals!

Do not get greedy.

Bernie's going to try to come in and say we should take that money from the DOD and give it to the Depts of Education and Health and Human Services to dole out.

Wrong answer.

You think conservatives are really going to accept that we have to cut the DOD budget or they can't keep the Second Amendment?

They already have their Second Amendment rights.

So we're not giving up anything to axe the U.S. military's budget.

(I say "institutionalized gun violence's" budget.)

potayto, potahto

Well here's what you give up:

Don't move the money to socialist causes.

Make it a nice big tax cut for businesses, workers, and families.

Conservatives will like that.

Lots of them are businesses, workers, and families.

And liberals too.

You can put your own tax cut toward any cause you want.

Then American conservatives can really be accomplishing something with all those fun days at the shooting range–

Acting as a deterrent to foreign military invasion.

V.

And that totally will work.

Like I said no one really wants to invade us anyway.

And if they did we'd STILL have a military that outmatches theirs.

AND if you thought Afghans and Vietnamese have done an impressive job of fighting off a vastly superior foreign military force with their guns, remember Americans have more, bigger, and better guns and are way more obsessed with them.

We would make some foreign invaders very sorry they tried it.

We don't need this much military spending to do that.

We could do that with 0$ military spending.

But with about 50 percent of its current budget, I bet we could somehow have even better national security.

And save all that money.

And there's way less guns in the world that way.

That's like fortunes that could sustain generations of people being spent on just guns, guns, guns.

SO many guns. So many kinds of guns.

Missiles. Bombs. Faster than sound jet planes to drop 'em.

Think it might be overkill?

---

Editor’s Note: This article is part of the author’s ongoing series called, ā€œIndependent Thought Alarm.ā€ It originally published on The Humble Libertarian, and has been republished on IVN with permission from the author.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Less Guns, More Butter Please

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us