Skip to content
Subscribe

Supervisors Vote For Study on Lilac Hills Ranch Community

Supervisors Vote For Study on Lilac Hills Ranch Community
Published:

San Diego-By a vote of 4-0, the County Board of Supervisors instructed county staff to draw up an independent analysis of the Lilac Hills Ranch proposed development just north of Escondido along the I-15 corridor.

Supervisor Dianne Jacob made the motion to have county staff prepare the report.

The analysis will be completed by July 29 and be part of an August 2nd Board of Supervisors hearing. At that time the Supervisors will have two choices. Put the LHR Initiative on the November ballot or approve the community outright.Supervisor Bill Horn was not allowed to vote on the project after the California Fair Practices Political Commission ruled his home, roughly three miles from the planned community, meant he had a conflict and could not vote.Accretive Investments reacted to the vote with the following statement."We support the Board's action and are confident the report will confirm what we've been saying about the benefits of this project. We are looking forward to giving San Diego voters a chance to support badly-needed housing in a well-planned, eco-friendly village."

Supervisor Jacob noted that Lilac Hills Ranch will likely be the first of many developments to use the initiative process to try and have their community approved. Jacob said this is because of the state Supreme Court's uncertainty over the Newhall case relating to Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and the fact that California is so unfriendly to developers.

Support for the project seems robust, as more than 110,000 signatures were gathered on the petition supporting Lilac Hills Ranch — far more than the 67,837 valid signatures needed to qualify the initiative for the ballot. Additionally, at the board of supervisors hearing, many more residents who live in the area of the proposed community spoke out in favor of the project. Indeed the tally of supporterts to detractors was 74-14. Opponents expressed concerns over traffic safety, fire response times and if the project fits within guidelines of the county general plan.

If approved, the project would be built over 10 years and would eventually include 903 single-family homes, 468 age-restricted senior homes, 164 condominiums, and 211 mixed-use units.

Chairman Ron Roberts noted that San Diego county is facing a critical housing shortage and the crisis is certainly impacting our business community. That was noted in a recent study released by the San Diego Chamber of Commerce. Roberts said it's high time for all interested parties to begin to work together and fashion a sensible solution to this crisis.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Supervisors Vote For Study on Lilac Hills Ranch Community

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us