Skip to content
Subscribe

McCain, Whitehouse to SCOTUS: Partisan Gerrymandering Wastes Votes and Silences Voices

McCain, Whitehouse to SCOTUS: Partisan Gerrymandering Wastes Votes and Silences Voices
Published:

US Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) are joining the legal fight against partisan gerrymandering.

McCain and Whitehouse filed a joint amicus brief to the Supreme Court in the case, Gill v. Whitford -- the first case in which a federal court ruled electoral districts unconstitutional not on the basis of race, gender, or socioeconomic class, but because of political discrimination.

In this case, the court ruled that Wisconsin legislative districts were so partisan that they violated the voting rights of those outside the Republican Party, the party that currently controls the state legislature and the redistricting process.

Of note, 31 briefs have been filed in Gill v Whitford against extreme partisan gerrymandering.

“Americans do not like gerrymandering,” McCain and Whitehouse write.

“They see its mischief, and absent a legal remedy, their sense of powerlessness and discouragement has increased, deepening the crisis of confidence in our democracy. We share this perspective. From our vantage point, we see wasted votes and silenced voices. We see hidden power. And we see a correctable problem.”

Gill v. Whitford, which is scheduled to be heard on October 3, forces the high court to revisit a 2004 decision in Vieth v. Jubelirer, in which the justices ruled that there was no measurable standard the court could use to determine what constitutes "too partisan" in legislative redistricting.

Without established Supreme Court precedent, federal courts have been reluctant to take up gerrymandering cases that don't deal with racial or socioeconomic discrimination.

"The increase in partisan gerrymandering following Vieth, fueled by dark money contributions and advanced technology, distorts our representative democracy and pollutes Americans’ faith in their political institutions,” McCain and Whitehouse write.

They add, “As Republicans and Democrats battle each other to control redistricting, the real losers are the American people.”

The situation, however, has changed as plaintiffs and redistricting reformers are using statistical models like the efficiency gap to establish a measurable standard to show how extreme partisan gerrymandering has become.

Gill v. Whitford has changed the legal and judicial paradigm, potentially opening the door for future challenges to partisan gerrymandering across the country, and an end to the two-party scheme.

Read McCain and Whitehouse's full amicus brief:

Photo Credit: Christopher Halloran / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

McCain, Whitehouse to SCOTUS: Partisan Gerrymandering Wastes Votes and Silences Voices

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us