Skip to content
Subscribe

Military Parades Are Really Partisan Spectacles

Military Parades Are Really Partisan Spectacles
Published:

It’s that time of year again…The time of year where President Trump asks for a military parade and the partisans on both sides go nuts.

“It’s like they’re from communist Russia, wanting to show off our military strength in a parade!”

“It’s like they’re from communist Russia, not wanting to support our military with a parade!”

When the idea of a parade is floated, those on the left mainly cite money and seeming fascist as the biggest cons, while those on the right cite “supporting our military” as the biggest pro.

So, what’s the reality?

To Have a Parade or Not to Have a Parade?

When asked the question above, there are a few things to understand before answering.

  • The “military parades are fascist” argument is a weak one. A military parade is not inherently fascist. The U.S. has had plenty of military parades. The nation’s most recent parade was in 1991, after the victory in the Persian Gulf. But don’t let people tell you they’re only for victories…there are plenty of cities around the US that host military parades on military-themed holidays such as Veterans Day, Memorial Day, or Independence Day. In fact, one of our authors just witnessed a military parade for Veterans Day marching down Columbia, South Carolina’s main street. So, don’t let people tell you military parades are a sign of fascism.
  • The “let’s use the money for our vets” one is a fantasy. The cost is not large enough to do anything substantial for the entirety of the veteran population, and at an estimated $20 million it’s well worth the marketing reach. The military spends a great deal on marketing its career opportunities to the citizens of the United States. A military parade provides a wonderful opportunity for extremely large “reach” as all the media outlets will surely cover it. And with all the hoopla about it, it’s sure to get more reach than normal.
  • The “troops hate parades” argument isn’t very good either. We’ll definitely agree that the troops in the parade will hate the parade. Every person who’s served in the active military knows that. To have a parade, the troops work their asses off to host it, march in it, etc., and it blows. We’d rather have the four-day weekend.
  • But on the flip side, the “Troops deserve the honor” argument doesn’t hold much water. Although it’s meant to honor the Troops most of “the Troops” will be indifferent about the whole thing. Despite what all these partisan vets and partisan pundits want to say, most active military will probably glance at the screen, say, “Oh, that was today?” and go about their day.
  • One interesting and not often heard argument is that a parade may help connect the civilian population and the military population. We were intrigued by this and will give it the benefit of the doubt. There is a feeling of being “forgotten” by the civilian population. The war still rages in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Syria, but most wouldn’t know if you asked. Therefore, it is a good point.
  • Finally, it’s not needed to show off military might. The entire world knows our military strength. It’s obvious from our spending amounts, from our world presence, or from the fact that we toppled what many experts believed to be the most effective military force in the Gulf region in under 30 days (Iraq, 2003). The military prides itself on being “silent professionals” and we know we’re the strongest, so there’s no need to bolster our spirits or for us to flaunt.

Reality

So, is one needed? No.

Would it be a horrible idea? Not really.

Would it be a great idea? Not really.

Will it matter much in the long run? Not at all.

Military parade or not, it’s more a partisan battle. If you hate Trump, you’ll hate the parade. If you love Trump, you’ll love the parade. If you’re nonpartisan, you’ll most likely think it’s a waste of time and money, but not really care much about it.

© 2018 Free Wheel Media. This article originally published on FreeWheelUs, and has been republished in its entirety with permission and by request of Free Wheel Media.

Photo Credit: Christopher Lyzcen / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Military Parades Are Really Partisan Spectacles

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us