Skip to content
Subscribe

Despite Occasional Lip Service, Military and Veterans Mostly Snubbed by Presidential Campaigns

Despite Occasional Lip Service, Military and Veterans Mostly Snubbed by Presidential Campaigns
Published:

In this contentious election, there is a group of voters whose concerns are going largely unaddressed: military service members, veterans, and their families. While both major party candidates' websites lay out vague plans to deal with ongoing problems at the VA as well as their foreign policy agendas, neither is directly addressing other issues that are of paramount concern to military families.

Third party candidates aren't much better, but they have been slightly more forthcoming than Trump or Clinton. Consider that there are more than 44 million military and veteran voters and they have one of the highest turnout rates of any voting demographic. In the 2012 election, 70 percent of military and veteran voters cast ballots, compared to 57.5 percent of voters in the general population. Candidates ignore these voters at their own peril.

According to a survey by the First Command Financial Behaviors Index, the most pressing concerns that service members and their families face are sequestration, the preservation of retirement benefits, and future defense spending.

In addition to annual pay raises that don't even meet the increase in the cost of living, many career military members who have served for more than a decade, often with multiple combat tours, face losing what is potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars with the overhaul of the retirement benefit system in 2018.

Defense spending determines the other benefits that military families depend upon, such as commissaries and Tricare, the military's health insurance program. Families have seen their out-of-pocket costs soar as a result of cuts to these programs, so it makes sense that military families are worried. In particular, co-pays and prescription costs have skyrocketed in recent years, increasing 400 percent or more in some cases in the last 10 years. All while receiving less than a 2 percent yearly pay raise.

"The notable gaps between military and civilian voters on these important national issues underscore the continuing financial uncertainty and concern being experienced by America's career service member families," said Scott Spiker, CEO of First Command. "Defense spending, sequestration, and the new military retirement are uniquely personal issues for those who have made the military their career."

Both Trump and Clinton have made non-specific comments regarding the elimination of the mandatory cuts associated with sequestration, yet neither has been forthcoming about how they plan to do this. According to reports, Mr. Trump plans to return the military to its pre-sequestration level, which would be good news for military families, as it would give them a degree of security in an otherwise insecure world. However, how he plans to pay for that restoration is unknown.

"Hillary Clinton is the Secretary of the Status Quo," Trump says. In this instance, and in her own words, he is correct.

According to her website, Mrs. Clinton plans to continue with more of the same cuts that have been causing hardships for the last several years by prioritizing "defense reform initiatives, curbing runaway cost growth in areas like health care and acquisition and stretching every dollar." The site does not give further details.

Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, who is ironically polling strongly with military members, has not really addressed what he plans to do about sequestration, except to slam those on the left and the right for their views, and his voting record shows he does not support a strong military, favoring budget cuts and cut and run policies.

Independent candidate Evan McMullin also does not address these issues on his website, except to say that spending at the Pentagon needs to be reformed.

Mrs. Clinton's website pays lip service to veterans and she promises that she will reform the VA; however, once again, it's more of the continued policies of the Obama administration, which have proven ineffective.

Veterans are still facing extremely long wait times for appointments and disability claims are going unprocessed or fraudulently denied. When a veteran is in pain and can get no help from the people who are supposed to help, suicide often feels like the only option. Currently, 22 veterans a day commit suicide.

In comparison, Mr. Trump, Mr. Johnson and Mr. McMullin have laid out plans for reforming the VA. Each candidate makes a compelling case for VA reform and offers promising suggestions. However, how they plan to pay for those changes is, once again, unclear.

Photo Credit: Rafiq Maqbool / AP

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Despite Occasional Lip Service, Military and Veterans Mostly Snubbed by Presidential Campaigns

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us