Skip to content
Subscribe

New Maine Bill: If You're Not a Party Member, You're "Unenrolled"

New Maine Bill: If You're Not a Party Member, You're "Unenrolled"
Published:

A new bill has worked its way into the Maine legislature. Presented and co-sponsored by Republican and Democratic state lawmakers, it seeks to “require candidates to be listed as unenrolled if not registered with a recognized party.”

That’s right, it seems that for these legislators, “independent” is now too strong of a word for those who decide to run with no party affiliation.

But it’s not only independents who would be affected by this law. The only recognized parties in the state of Maine are Republican, Democratic, and Green Independent. That means, for instance, that a Libertarian candidate would also have an "unenrolled" designation on the ballot.

Some opponents have referred to this bill as the “Party Protection Plan,” since it is likely to give recognized party candidates an advantage at the polls over the unimpressive and uninformative designation "unenrolled."

It's important to note that Maine has a considerably high independent voter population (37% of the total electorate), state voters elected one of the only two independent U.S. senators in Congress, and Maine is one of the only states in the country that currently has two independent state legislators.

It certainly seems like some in Maine's government have a strategy to hold on to power, which they feel is being taken away from them by those pesky voters.

And it doesn't stop there.

Many state lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle are going after the citizens' initiative process; particularly, after state voters approved Ranked Choice Voting to reform the state’s election process. Ranked choice voting was approved with more than 400,000 votes, the second-highest ‘Yes’ vote in the state’s initiative history.

Governor Paul LePage talked about the initiative process during his State of the State. He was very assertive, saying that direct democracy is not good for the people of Maine, in part, because he believes it is making the legislators less relevant.

Several bills were introduced in the legislature – right after Ranked Choice Voting passed – going after the initiative process, which means future efforts at voter-approved reform in Maine are in jeopardy.

On ranked choice specifically, Maine’s Senate voted (with a 24-10 vote) in favor of asking for an advisory opinion from Maine’s Supreme Court, which is likely to delay or even kill its implementation all together.

Forcing independents to run as ‘unenrolled,’ delaying ranked choice voting, and attacking citizens’ initiatives -- is the partisan political establishment trying to cripple Maine’s independent and reformative streak?

Photo Credit: Felix Lopov / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

New Maine Bill: If You're Not a Party Member, You're "Unenrolled"

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us