Skip to content
Subscribe

NEW POLL: 5 Years In, CA Voters Still Love Nonpartisan Primaries

NEW POLL: 5 Years In, CA Voters Still Love Nonpartisan Primaries
Published:

Five years after adopting top-two, nonpartisan open primaries, California has seen its legislature transform from a state of dysfunction into a successful model for reform. Now, a new survey reveals that the people of California are noticing.

Last month, the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) found that most voters in California are satisfied with the state’s nonpartisan open primary system, with 60% of likely voters in California saying it has “been mostly a good thing.”

The PPIC’s findings reflect the role that top-two has played in reducing the polarization and paralysis that once gripped California’s legislature.

Recognizing that a flawed electoral system was the root source of this problem, voters passed Prop 14 in 2010 — a measure to open the primaries in all state and congressional races.

Under the top-two primary, all voters can vote for any candidate in the primary, with the top two vote-getters advancing to the general election regardless of party. This system differs from “partisan open primaries,” in which voters must select a party ballot to vote on.

Why do most Californians approve of the system?

Research conducted by Jason Olson of Open Primaries and political scientist Omar H. Ali of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro on the “early successes” of California’s top-two primaries revealed a host of likely reasons.

For instance, now that candidates have the incentive to appeal to all voters (not just those on extreme ends of the political spectrum), California currently boasts the nation’s most competitive elections, as well as record numbers of defeated incumbents.

Now that legislators must be loyal to their constituents (not their parties), California has seen legislators break with their parties on key votes.

Nonpartisan open primaries have led to the election of more moderate officials who are willing to reach across party lines and actually get things done for the people. The result? Public approval for California’s state legislature has skyrocketed by 300%.

PPIC’s findings not only reaffirm this uptick in public approval, but further show that Californians know they made the right decision when they chose to give a voice to the state’s 4.5 million independent voters.

When all voters can vote, everyone benefits. And now, the numbers show it.

Editor's note: This article, written by Open Primaries intern Stephanie Geier, originally published on Open Primaries' blog, and has been modified slightly for publication on IVN.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

NEW POLL: 5 Years In, CA Voters Still Love Nonpartisan Primaries

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us