Skip to content
Subscribe

Is Obama Ready to Take Bullet for Clinton on Benghazi?

Is Obama Ready to Take Bullet for Clinton on Benghazi?
Published:

President Truman was well known for the sign on his desk stating, 'The buck stops here.'  In a constitutional republic, the president is the highest executive power and has to be the ultimate one to accept responsibility.

President Obama's actions this week, specifically naming the lack of planning for the aftermath of Libya as his greatest failure, is a curious admission, and one where the timing makes it seem like he's ready to take the political bullet for Hillary Clinton for the handling of the Benghazi attacks.

There's no doubt that then-Secretary of State Clinton has taken the most political pressure and criticism for the handling of the Benghazi incident, and the apparent total lack of intelligence that attacks were imminent on the diplomatic compound.

Over twenty congressional hearings later, critics are still at square one with their attacks, and the ultimate defense has always been that the 'fog of war' can never be predicted.

This is a smart political move by Obama, but probably won't deflect many attacks from the Democratic front-runner.

What it will do, however, is give those on the edge just that little nudge to be able to just shrug and accept that it was Obama's total failure, and not something that should potentially haunt the next Democratic White House.

But this is also signalling that Obama is trying to create a clean slate for the next president, Democratic or Republican.

We're still locked into military engagements throughout the Middle East, Gitmo prisons remain open, and we continue to deal with the increasing rise of radicalized Islam. The next president must approach these problems with a fresh perspective and a clean slate in order to make headway against the problems.

Just accepting the status quo and/or pointing fingers for past failures is not going to be sufficient. If anything, President Obama learned the hard way that you cannot simply blame your predecessor for your problems, because all too often it winds up that you will just perpetuate the problems because you lack a real plan.

Whoever wins the White House in 2016 is going to face some tough realities. The Arab Spring was a failure and lost us some long-term allies and stable-regime enemies, ISIS and Boko Haram's ability to strike targets at will seems to be increasing, and political and military problems continue to grow in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The next president needs to acknowledge their predecessor's roles, but have real plans to deal with these problems.

Because we cannot afford another 8 years of status quo Middle East foreign policy.

Photo Credit: David Peterlin / Shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Is Obama Ready to Take Bullet for Clinton on Benghazi?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us