Skip to content
Subscribe

Open Primaries: Chosen by Voters, Attacked by Lawmakers

Open Primaries: Chosen by Voters, Attacked by Lawmakers
Published:

The election landscape in Colorado recently underwent a significant makeover.

Thanks to two initiatives spearheaded by Let Colorado Vote, a coalition dedicated to expanding voter access to the ballot for all taxpaying Colorado citizens, unaffiliated voters now have the opportunity to participate in all stages of elections.

Since 2008, Colorado has led the nation in the growth of unaffiliated voters who – at 35% of active voters – number more than Democrats or Republicans.

The successful propositions championed by Let Colorado Vote opened primary elections to 1.2 million unaffiliated Colorado voters, allowing them to fully participate in presidential, state, and local elections.

Proposition 107 eliminated Colorado’s caucus and reinstated a presidential primary, as they had used in the past, while opening that presidential primary to unaffiliated voters.

Proposition 108 opened the existing state and local primaries to unaffiliated voters.

Proposition 107 and 108 were passed in November 2016’s election with 64% and 53% of the vote, respectively.

Today, Let Colorado Vote is intricately involved in the implementation of the newly-passed open primary initiatives. Following the voters’ victory at the ballot box, the propositions were signed into law by Governor John Hickenlooper in January.

However, in the subsequent legislative session, Colorado politicians introduced Senate Bill 305 to change the new law, saying that it was difficult to implement in its current form.

The final bill, which was not shared with Let Colorado Vote or county election experts who run elections, was rushed in the last ten days of the legislative cycle.

Senate Bill 305 contained, among other things, language to ask unaffiliated voters to choose a ballot and to send separate Republican and Democratic ballots to each voter.

Beyond simple technical fixes, these changes would force an independent voter to go through a process that closely resembles traditional party affiliation, just with a new name.

Senate Bill 305 also included a requirement for the counties to canvas the election based on party participation, which means the counties would have to count how many ballots of each party type they receive in an election.

This seemingly innocuous provision enabled the state to provide, and the parties to receive, the primary voter participation data of unaffiliated voters.

Per Jason Bertolacci of Let Colorado Vote:

“The hasty, last-minute introduction of SB 305 didn’t give Colorado general assembly members, county election officials, or anyone concerned about Colorado’s elections time to fully think through the bill’s implications.”

Bertolacci went on to say that it was unprecedented for the proponents of a proposition to not be involved at a fundamental level in discussing the types of changes contained in the bill.

The changes introduced by SB 305 undermined the will of the voters, so Let Colorado Vote launched a full-fledged campaign against the bill.

Over a weekend the campaign gathered 1,100 signatures and ran digital and TV advertising. Their efforts were successful, and they came to an agreement with lawmakers that any reference to voters having to choose or any process that asked unaffiliated voters their preference for a ballot was removed from the bill, while an amended canvassing requirement stayed.

However, the organization still has concerns that in light of the fact that Colorado has a system in which subscribers can pay to receive voter information, the canvassing may dissuade some unaffiliated voters from participating in the primary.

These voters may not wish to have the primary in which the voter participated disclosed publicly, and therefore may not vote at all.

Colorado has voter confidentiality laws, so if a voter wishes, they can opt to have some of their voting data remain confidential. Let Colorado Vote is still working through whether those laws adequately address their concerns. If they don’t, they’ll work on a way for voters to opt-out of publicly publishing their voting info through rule-making and future legislation.

Let Colorado Vote is a proud member of the coalition of reform organizations behind "Unrig the System," an event aimed at reforming Colorado politics. Find out more by watching the video below or by visiting unrig.it.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Open Primaries: Chosen by Voters, Attacked by Lawmakers

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us