Skip to content
Subscribe

OPINION: Why Voter Reform Trumps Impeachment

Here are four reasons voter reform is a far better, and more permanent solution to the problems the most earnest Democrats are hoping to solve by impeaching Donald Trump.

OPINION: Why Voter Reform Trumps Impeachment
Published:

Impeachment headlines have dominated the news cycle for much of Donald Trump’s presidency. The relentless clamor for impeachment, along with the lack of anything substantial so far for Democrats to hang their hat on as an impeachable offense, smacks of partisan fervor and political gamesmanship, rather than serious and enlightened statecraft.

The loudest voices for impeachment appear to have their end in mind ahead of any facts that might turn up impeachable offenses, and they’ve spent President Trump’s first term scouring for the facts to shoe-horn in to their predetermined agenda.

And so the impeachment wing of the Democratic Party appears to be all too eagerly weaponizing the impeachment powers in the Constitution as a means for waging partisan warfare against the president of the opposing party, rather than turning to it as a necessary contingency and end in itself in the face of an unequivocally impeachable offense.

This approach is unfortunately short-sighted and doesn’t hold the best interests of the voters and their democratic form of government in mind. Here are four reasons voter reform is a far better, and more permanent solution to the problems the most earnest Democrats are hoping to solve by impeaching Donald Trump.

1. Voter Reform Is More Democratic

Impeachment proceedings that are anything but firmly situated on a solid and irreproachable theory of impeachment, based on an unquestionable record of clear wrongdoing on the part of US officials elected to high office, undermine the constitutional prerogative of voters to self-government via the more-or-less orderly electoral processes of our democracy. Impeachment is a first step toward removal from office. If there’s any doubt about legitimacy of the charges against a sitting president, it’s more democratic to let voters remove them from office.

2. Voter Reform Creates Permanent Changes

If the Democrats were somehow able to muster an impeachment of President Donald Trump, take control of the Senate in 2020, try him, and remove him from office, that would be an enormous exhaustion of political capital and resources for a one-time fix of a one-time problem. Voter reforms like non-partisan primaries and alternative ballot methods create lasting changes that better qualify candidates for elected office over and over again in every future election.

3. Voter Reform Empowers Voters, Not Parties

But don’t forget that impeachment proceedings create permanent changes too. The way Democrats have used impeachment as a way to stonewall a Republican president nearly as soon as he took the oath of office, may set a precedent. As a columnist recently wrote at The Hill, the “Trump impeachment efforts will haunt the next Democrat in the White House.” He points out we have transitioned since 2016 from the already oft-bemoaned perpetual election season, to the perpetual impeachment season. Fighting off never-ending impeachment pushes could now become par for the course for every sitting president. If that happens, it will increase the two-party system’s gridlock, hyper-polarized partisanship, and stranglehold over Washington politics.

4. Voter Reform Is Realistic and Practical

It is unlikely that impeachment will go anywhere. When Bill Clinton was impeached by the Republican House, he was exonerated by the Senate with a comfortable margin of Republican support. Mitch McConnell has already vowed to block impeachment in the upper chamber. Recent polls show most Americans think Donald Trump will be impeached by the House and win reelection in 2020. The Democrats pushing for impeachment have been spinning their wheels for going on four years. But election reform is achievable and creates practical solutions that voters of all stripes can support. In fact 2018 was a landmark year for voter reform. Ranked choice voting, alternative voting methods, and anti-gerrymandering measures passed in states and cities all over the country.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

OPINION: Why Voter Reform Trumps Impeachment

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us