Skip to content
Subscribe

Paul Ryan May Redefine the Phrase 'Game Changer'

Paul Ryan May Redefine the Phrase 'Game Changer'
Published:

Credit: Washington Post

The phrase “game changer” has been thrown around a lot in politics since the 2008 presidential election. Now the word has become standard in political vernacular. There may not be a person those two words apply to more than Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI).

Mitt Romney was under no obligation to pick a favorite among the far right. Independent conservatives and Tea Party activists were already going to vote for him. However, they weren’t going to vote for his ticket as much as they were going to vote to defeat President Barack Obama.

Regardless, Romney could have picked whoever he wanted and many political analysts and pundits believed he was going to pick a safe choice. They believed he was going to pick someone who might be perceived as bland, but there was no threat of him or her going off the reservation. The odds-on favorites were political figures like Rob Portman (R-OH) or Tim Pawlenty (R-MN).

In 2008, there were a number of voting records set during the presidential race and, more impressively, during the nomination process. There was a significant amount of excitement among Democrats as the party knew they had a very good chance at taking the Oval Office. Many states saw a dramatic increase in voter participation.

The Democrats had an exciting race for the party’s nomination. For the first time in United States history the first viable female candidate and the first viable black candidate were not only in the race, but going head-to-head. History was going to be made regardless of the outcome, and people like to be a part of something that exciting.

The Democratic Party had voter excitement on their side. Republicans couldn’t garnish the same level of enthusiasm. Moderate Republicans don’t generate very much excitement and conservative Republicans and independent conservative voters couldn’t get the base rallied up for John McCain. Conservatives liked Sarah Palin, but she didn’t have the name recognition or reputation among far right activists as she does today.

In 2012, the GOP has an opportunity to do something that doesn’t happen very often. They have an opportunity to defeat an incumbent president. Americans are uncertain about the state of the economy, unemployment is at a stalemate, and Barack Obama doesn’t have anywhere near the excitement he had in 2008. Still, as the incumbent, he still has the statistical advantage.

The Republican Party knows they need an enthusiastically active base in November to get out the vote if they want to keep the House, take the majority in the Senate, and win the White House. Mitt Romney can’t get very many people excited. He is only marginally better than John McCain when it comes to that. His advisers have probably informed him of this, but there were people high on the short list for possible VP picks that could rally the base.

The announcement of Mitt Romney’s choice flooded social media almost instantly. Everyone was talking about Paul Ryan, and conservative activists were praising the decision. The enthusiasm levels spiked overnight. Suddenly, the presidential race has become a whole new ballgame.

Many conservatives tend to forget -- ignore rather -- Paul Ryan’s voting record in Congress during the Bush administration and focus more on his record during the Obama administration. After all, if we take an in-depth look at Ryan’s record it is just as inconsistent as the man who picked him for the VP nomination. Especially, if one is a fan of fiscal responsibility and limited government. This is, however, neither here nor there for many conservatives.

Paul Ryan is the man for far right grassroots activists and a celebrity in the Republican Party. Celebrity status in a party can be beneficial in a presidential race. After all, Barack Obama was a celebrity in the Democratic Party and he ran for president with a very limited record to support him. Ryan has a record and over the last few years it has been friendly to the Tea Party. He is also a representative from Wisconsin. The reason this is important to note is because he could help Romney take the state in November, which despite Scott Walker's recall victory, looks to favor Barack Obama at the moment.

If we are talking about “game changers” in the 2012 presidential election, Rep. Paul Ryan may be just that for the Republican Party. Tea Partiers and independent conservatives have their reason to vote for the GOP ticket now rather than just vote against the Obama/Biden ticket. It will be interesting to see how Ryan shapes the campaign and the race as a whole.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Paul Ryan May Redefine the Phrase 'Game Changer'

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us