Skip to content
Subscribe

Proposed Legislation to Protect Cellphone Privacy Has Broad Public Support

Proposed Legislation to Protect Cellphone Privacy Has Broad Public Support
Published:

In a world where privacy seems to be continually decreasing, one man has dared to fight back. Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) plans to make a push for

regulations protecting cellphone users from government data-gathering programs.

Changes Markey hopes to introduce include: requiring law enforcement to get a warrant before obtaining cellphone data locations, requiring the FCC to limit how long carriers can keep certain information, and requiring law enforcement personnel to submit a signed and sworn statement when acquiring information from carriers.

While it's too early to know for sure how Markey's efforts will be received by the U.S. government and the American people, Hanni M. Fakhoury, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is "cautiously and hopefully optimistic" about these regulations.

"There have been similar proposals floated in the past in Congress, but I think we're at a watershed moment right now," he said. "There is growing outcry about the NSA surveillance and that, in turn, has put renewed focus and attention on domestic law enforcement collection too."

Data from Gallup seems to support Fakhoury's description of a "growing outcry." A June report showed that 53 percent of Americans disapprove of the federal government's surveillance activities, while only 37 percent approve.As with any effort to limit government power, opposition is to be expected.

"You'll definitely see law enforcement opposition to anything that restricts their access to this data," Fakhoury said. He also suggested that telecommunications companies "won't care one way or the other as long as they're not saddled with any new burdens -- such as a reporting requirement -- or costs."

However, congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), who says he and colleagues have also been working on this issue, pointed out that this is not just about limiting law enforcement's access to private data. Steps should be taken, he suggested, to protect this data from criminals, businesses, and others.

While this year may be coming to a close, Fakhoury hopes that next year will be a big one for privacy advocates.

"I think more states will join the fray in 2014 and hopefully that will trickle down to federal lawmakers too. People are outraged, and lawmakers are dragging their feet to finally respond to the concerns of citizens."

IVN also contacted representatives from the Electronic Privacy Information Center, but they were unavailable to comment at the time of this article's publication.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Proposed Legislation to Protect Cellphone Privacy Has Broad Public Support

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us