Skip to content
Subscribe

Ranked Choice Voting Opponents Are At It Again in Maine

Ranked Choice Voting Opponents Are At It Again in Maine
Published:

Ranked choice voting (RCV) opponents tried to repeal RCV for state primaries and non-presidential federal elections in Maine. They failed. They tried to have a federal court throw out RCV results in the 2018 general election. They failed. They tried to garner enough signatures for a people’s veto against RCV for presidential elections. They failed.

Yet the motto of RCV opponents in Maine apparently is if at first you don’t succeed at overturning the will of the people, try, try, try, try, and try again.

The Fulcrum’s Bill Theobald reports that another lawsuit has been filed challenging the use of ranked choice voting in Maine elections.

“The lawsuit — filed on behalf of four Maine voters against Gov. Janet Mills, Attorney General Aaron Frey and Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap — is the just the latest in a series of challenges to RCV in Maine, which was initially approved by voters in 2016 for use in state and congressional elections,” writes Theobald

The lawsuit is based on the tired arguments that have failed in federal courts not just in Maine, but in places around the country. Specifically, that ranked choice voting is too confusing and that some ballots will be exhausted if voters don’t understand that they are supposed to rank their preferences.

Essentially, RCV opponents assert that Maine voters are too dumb to understand the alternative voting method. And, in the event that someone might be confused in the first election to use it -- new systems do take adjusting to -- RCV opponents say they are incapable of learning from the experience.

Yet, post-2018 polling shows most Maine voters had no problem with ranked choice voting. In fact, according to FairVote, 75% of all Maine voters -- including Democrats AND Republicans -- surveyed said they found voting under RCV to be “easy.” Sixty-two percent believed it was important that candidates win with a majority -- rather than just a plurality.

There is enough legal precedent on the side of RCV proponents that the latest lawsuit is not likely to succeed. U.S. District Court Judge Lance Walker not only upheld the use of RCV in Maine in a 2018 opinion, but addressed very similar claims of voter confusion and voters not being treated equally because they failed to rank the candidates on the ballot.

“I find the form of the ballot and the associated instructions more than adequate to apprise the voter of how to express preferences among the candidates,” wrote Judge Walker.

Mainers have voted twice to use ranked choice voting in Maine elections. In fact, in 2018, nearly 50,000 more voters cast a ballot to protect RCV than the state’s top political office in both parties’ primaries combined. The Maine Legislature also voted in overwhelming numbers to expand its use to presidential elections in 2019.

Yet, no matter how many wins RCV proponents stack up, the challenges to its use continue -- propagated by those who would deny voters more choice and a stronger voice in elections. The good news is that based on the record of these challenges, this lawsuit too is likely to fail. Stay tuned for more on this story.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Ranked Choice Voting Opponents Are At It Again in Maine

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us