Skip to content
Subscribe

Regardless of What the Media Says: Vote!

Regardless of What the Media Says: Vote!
Published:

The mass media seems to only want to fuel the perception that their goal is to influence and sway public opinion during elections.

With the 24-hour news-cycle bombshell that Hillary Clinton has now locked in the nomination, will people just stay home and not vote?

Regardless of whatever happens today at the polls, there are going to be thousands of Sanders supporters left with a sour-taste on the whole process, from beginning to end: from the fact that superdelegates determined the contest for the media, to feeling like the deck was stacked against them by the Democratic Party, the state primary process, and the media's coverage (and at times lack thereof) of the ongoing battle that Sanders has waged.

At this point, it doesn't look like Sanders can stop Clinton from the magic number of 2,026, where she captures the majority of the pledged delegates, neutralizing much of the superdelegate argument against her.

But it's also equally unlikely that she'll outright win enough pledged delegates to win the nomination without help from the superdelegates -- and that is what the Sanders' camp is counting on.

Whether Sanders' campaign is willing to publicly admit it or not, he needs to stay in this race as long as possible, just in case Clinton winds up with a serious indictment in the private email scandal.

His presence serves as a safety valve. But playing the role of safety valve is not all that Sanders is interested in. He wants an outright win by presenting a compelling case at the convention.

Neither side, Clinton nor Sanders, can afford to have their supporters assume that it's a 'done deal.' They need every single vote in these last 7 races, and can't afford to allow the other campaign to gain lopsided victories.

Just a couple of months ago, I wrote about the growing possibility of the media calling races before they were even finished. The AP's decision to tinker with their delegate count on the eve of the most crucial contest yet seems awfully suspicious, and definitely like it was a purposeful ploy to skew voter behavior.

But in the end, crying foul about the media's influence on voters won't accomplish much. Regardless of whatever the media says, the voters of these last 7 contests need to get to the polls and vote, because their votes are still critical in deciding the long-term outcome of this race.

Photo Credit: Barbara Kalbfleisch / Shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Regardless of What the Media Says: Vote!

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us