Skip to content
Subscribe

10 Years Later, Santa Fe Continues to Deny Voters Ranked Choice Voting

10 Years Later, Santa Fe Continues to Deny Voters Ranked Choice Voting
Published:

SANTA FE, N.M. - The majority of Santa Fe voters sent a message to city officials in 2008: They want a change to the way local elections are conducted. They want ranked choice voting.

City voters approved a local initiative to adopt ranked choice voting for local elections in 2008. Yet nearly 10 years later, they are still waiting for it to be implemented.

So what's the hold up?

Well, the city council recently decided to push the implementation of ranked choice voting back to an unspecified timetable. There is no way of knowing when city officials will honor the will voters, even though it is mandated by the city charter.

Some council members reportedly expressed concerns -- among other things -- that voting machine manufacturer Dominion would not be able to meet state-mandated deadlines to certify its new ranked choice voting software for the next city election.

Voting machines in New Mexico must, by law, be the same, so even if other municipalities do not use ranked choice voting, the voting machines they use must have the technology capable of using it. So the state must get involved in the process as well.

FairVote's Maria Perez, however, says the city council process and vote was suspect.

"There was no space for public comment. There were no questions from any of the organizational partners in the room, including myself," Perez said in an interview with SantaFe.com.

She added that FairVote is ready to assist with voter education concerns. They have the staff and the resources to help, but she was not allowed to talk about that during the city council meeting.

"There was no opportunity for anybody to say anything outside of council members, and the city clerk," she said.

Perez noted that New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver was "working diligently" on the technological issues for ranked choice voting, but no one from her office was there to answer questions either.

You can read more on the city council hearing here.

Despite the present hurdles in the way of getting this voter-approved initiative implemented, Perez says the fight to move forward on ranked choice voting is not over. Proponents will continue to explore options to get it implemented for the next city election in March.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

10 Years Later, Santa Fe Continues to Deny Voters Ranked Choice Voting

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us