Skip to content
Subscribe

Shutdowns Are Stupid

Shutdowns Are Stupid
Published:

Happy Monday fellow independent voters! Hope you had a great weekend and are anticipating a good, worthwhile, productive, and imminently enjoyable next week of your life, and if you're not, that you're dead set on making it even just slightly more that way to whatever degree it's in your power to do so.

And while you're checking in on the news cycle and keeping your finger to the pulse of the republic, if you really want to red pill yourself today, take a few minutes and try to figure out why Saudi Arabia's government could only ever shut down once, and the U.S.A has shut down 19 times since 1976.

Weird that it was on the bicentennial anniversary of the U.S. that this tradition started, eh? Oh what, did you think the shutdown kabuki theater started in 1996 with Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich? Ha!

I know that's right around the time 24-hour cable news and America's Baudrillardian television hyper-reality reached a critical mass, but you've forgotten or didn't even know about Ford and Carter's shutdown shenanigans, just like most millennials will look at you with a blank stare if you mention Newt Gingrich, and were blindsided by Trump's victory in 2016 because they had no idea what the score was with the Clintons.

The time honored perennial U.S. government shutdown tradition is and has always been stupid. Not because it's so horrible and dysfunctional like everybody says, but because it actually wants you to think it's those things, when it's not.

It's fake news about fake political dysfunction. It is designed to reinforce the status quo by making partisan voters believe there is a huge political confrontation going down in Washington.

But there's not really.

The government is going to keep taking America's money (we're up to $4 trillion federal budgets under Donald Trump and the GOP Congress, and over 20% of GDP since 2008), and spending it with powerful special interest groups with serious lobbying muscle. (That's how you get a congressman, by the way. They represent lobbyists, not voters).

And none of that will make most voters' lives better. Tragically, it probably makes life a little harder for them than it has to be with robots making almost everything and Elon Musk on the verge of inventing cold fusion or something.

But if the system can scapegoat somebody for the problems, it can continue on, so it splits in two and scapegoats itself.

It's like evil genius level design, but there's no actual evil genius puppet master who planned it out that way, just the system naturally protecting itself because there is so much at stake.

Adam Smith's invisible hand doesn't go away when you modify natural market forces into something perverse. It keeps quietly and mysteriously moving people, only now it's corrupt.

You can tell our governments shutdowns are really just a cry for attention (to misdirect your attention), because if they were actually real or really important in any way, they wouldn't happen at all.

Think Saudi Arabia or China's government can shut down more than once? When Egypt and Tunisia's governments shut down, they got a new government. Now that's a government shut down.

The U.S.A.'s partisan politics on the other hand are a made for television drama, not the real substance of what's happening in the system itself, the "deep state" if you will.

And though there are multiple 24-hour news channels, none of them are going to take the time to go into that and give you a deeper understanding of how the world and politics works, which is how you know the MSM is part of the system and why people loved the term "fake news."

Even when every word coming out of Don Lemon's mouth is technically, factually true, it's not real. It's not that the news is fake, it's that CNN itself is posing as a news company.

The Trump / Schumer shutdown was probably the lamest, fakest, stupidest shutdown yet. It's already over.

If "Dem'o'craps" and "Repugnants" (the Internet's terms, not mine) could come to an agreement that quickly and easily, why not right before the shutdown? Because it's better for the system to have the drama. And the anger. And the blame.

And none of these things are going to make your life better or the system more honest. In fact, they're designed to keep both you as an individual and the system from changing.

And that's my independent opinion about shut downs.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Shutdowns Are Stupid

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us