Skip to content
Subscribe

Soros Fuels $100M Partisan Showdown to Control California Maps

Proposition 50, the special election measure in California to adopt a new legislative-drawn congressional map, is becoming the most controversial ballot measure in recent history – and it is attracting more than just attention.

Soros Fuels $100M Partisan Showdown to Control California Maps
Photo by Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung on Flickr. Photo shared under a Creative Commons license.
Published:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Proposition 50, the special election measure in California to adopt a new legislative-drawn congressional map, is becoming the most controversial ballot measure in recent history – and it is attracting more than just attention.

It has also opened the floodgates to big money from high-profile megadonors.

The New York Times was first to report that George Soros recently contributed the single-highest donation to the Prop 50 campaign so far: $10 million, which adds to the already $40+ million donated to the campaign.

For a time, Yes on 50 and its opposition were practically neck-and-neck in contributions. However, according to numbers compiled by Ballotpedia, Soros’ donation has now tipped the scales considerably.

Ballotpedia figures

Soros has also brought the total money count close to the $100 million mark. The bulk of contributions for the No on Prop 50 campaign has come from California businessman, experimental physicist, and election reform advocate Dr. Charles Munger Jr.

Munger was involved in the 2008 and 2010 campaigns to adopt the independent commission that took redistricting out of the hands of elected officials – something Prop 50 would circumvent.

And for the record, the total amount contributed for and against the commission in 2010 was $20.77 million (a drop in the bucket by today’s standards).

The California Constitution explicitly prohibits partisan and legislative gerrymandering. However, Prop 50 would amend the state constitution to allow for what has been pitched as a one-time-only exception to nullify a mid-decade gerrymander in Texas.

The goal: Just as Texas Republicans are trying to secure five additional seats for the GOP ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, California Democrats are trying to take five seats away from Republicans with their new proposed map.

Some districts would see dramatic shifts in partisan advantage, like CA-1 held by U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa, which could go from R+25% (based on 2024 election results) to a projected D+12% based on how people within the new boundaries voted for president.

Then, in 2031, the independent redistricting commission would redraw the congressional map, following what has become the standard procedure in California.

First IRC Chair Urges Californians to Protect Independent Redistricting

Soros’ involvement is likely to make what has already been a deeply partisan issue even more so, as he is treated as a common “boogeyman” in Republican and conservative circles.

The entirety of the California Democratic Party, its members in the legislature, Gov. Gavin Newsom (who proposed the plan), the state’s biggest labor unions, former President Barack Obama, former VP Kamala Harris, and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi all support Prop 50.

On the “no” side are the Republican Party, its members in the legislature, former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, State Asm. Carl DeMaio’s Reform California, former U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and several business organizations.

There are a few notable examples of high-profile individuals crossing party lines – few, but not zero.

In an op-ed for CalMatters, Democrat Jeanne Raya urges Californians to reject Prop 50. Raya served as the independent redistricting commission’s first chair, and while she says she would celebrate gains for her party, this isn’t the right way to go about it.

“[I]t can’t be at the expense of California’s Constitution – nor its voters who mandated fair, nonpartisan redistricting,” she writes.

Newsom said the move by Texas Republicans justifies a retaliatory strike. But we witness daily the chaos and mistrust created by revenge politics in Washington. That is not the model of responsible government Californians deserve. Nor do Californians want to spend millions of taxpayer dollars to gamble that different congressional districts will produce the sought-after change, while real problems remain unaddressed.”

Raya did not spare her contempt for mid-decade redistricting in Texas, either, calling it “an attempt to rig the 2026 election in favor of Republicans – at the behest of President Donald Trump.” But she also says “Newsom should look for a different response to redistricting warfare.”

She points to U.S. Rep. Kevin Kiley’s bill to ban mid-decade congressional redistricting as an example.

Newsom says Democrats can take back Congress if the American people are given a fair chance, a voice, and a choice. In California, the people already have that chance, and it’s the independent redistricting commission,” Raya writes.

Her op-ed was published shortly after Schwarzenegger condemned Prop 50 during a forum at the University of Southern California, stating that Newsom and California Democrats are “trying to fight for democracy by getting rid of the democratic principles of California.”

It also came shortly after the United Domestic Workers (UDW) – one of the largest unions in California – pledged its support for Prop 50, and promised a robust campaign to get voters to support it as well.

According to UDW, it launched a massive canvassing campaign in San Diego County on September 20.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Soros Fuels $100M Partisan Showdown to Control California Maps

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us