Skip to content
Subscribe

A Tough, But Compassionate Proposal to Fix the Two-Party Immigration Disaster

A Tough, But Compassionate Proposal to Fix the Two-Party Immigration Disaster
Published:

The president’s policy of separating immigrant families from their children at the border is an appalling reaction to an immigration problem that both parties helped create. It goes against every value for which this country – as a beacon of freedom, human rights and hope – has long stood, and brought worldwide scorn, deservedly so.

Let’s be clear: immigrant families arriving at the border to claim asylum, to escape the violence in their own country or simply to start a new and better life here must be kept together, even those families entering the country illegally, which is a misdemeanor. That we are even debating this shows how far American values have been weakened by our poisonous political discourse.

Now that President Trump has given in to public outcry and reversed his disastrous policy, perhaps both political parties can finally work together to deal with the immigration issue. But don’t count on it.

The last time major changes to our immigration laws were made was more than 30 years ago. Since then, the divisions between the two parties have only worsened. The extreme voices in both parties are more intent on winning the day’s news cycle, attacking their opponents, often with false charges, and worrying about the next election than solving real problems.

This is true for most issues, but nowhere is it more evident than in the issue of immigration. Despite the harsh rhetoric and volatile disagreements, there is broad consensus that our immigration policies must be overhauled to reflect the evolving economic and cultural reality of America’s great diversity. The solutions are right in front of us. But reaching consensus means both sides have to be willing to give a little, to drop their soundbites and meet somewhere in the middle.

I envision a four-part strategy on immigration that incorporates some Democratic positions and some Republican ones, which I believe reflects the views of the overwhelming majority of Americans.

1. Define a path to citizenship. There are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in this country. It is simply not economically or logistically practical to deport them all, and enforcement alone won’t work. Anyone here more than five years – who has worked, paid taxes and has no criminal record – should be able to earn citizenship through a rigorous process that includes background checks, paying a penalty and taxes, and learning English. We should also cover DACA recipients – young immigrants who came here with their families through no fault of their own – as well as people who are covered by the Temporary Protective Status from countries affected by armed conflict or national disaster. Keeping families of mixed immigration status together is the right thing to do.

2. Add more border security. Republicans often argue that all we need is tougher border security, while Democrats only want to offer a path to citizenship. Why not do both? We spend $17 billion a year on border enforcement, and the number of illegal crossings has decreased substantially.

In fact, despite what the president says, immigration on our southern border is more of a humanitarian issue than a security issue. Only a small number of illegal immigrants have any connection with criminal gangs.

Nevertheless, by utilizing new technology and greater manpower, we could reduce illegal crossings even further, from around 300,000 in 2017 to under 150,000. Whether a wall is the best solution versus some combination of fencing, manpower and modern technology remains an open question.

3. Expand the national E-Verify program. Eight states require nearly all employers to use the federal government’s online “E-Verify” tool to check whether new hires are eligible to work in the U.S. But efforts to expand the mandate to all states have stalled, despite polls showing widespread support and studies showing it reduces unauthorized workers by more than one-third. We should mandate that every employer in every state use it. If people are uncertain whether they can get a job, they are much less likely to come to this country. We could temporarily exempt a few industries, such as hospitality and some agricultural jobs, that are currently facing serious labor shortages.

4. Increase legal immigration. To offset the reduction of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, we would need to increase the number of legal immigrants in order to fill the demand in our workforce. We need thoughtful public debate about how to prioritize these applicants and determine how many visas of each type to issue.

My priority list would include: people who have helped our military overseas; people who are ready to take jobs where we have labor shortages. (For example, in Maryland our crab industry is suffering from a shortage of workers who normally come here under temporary work visas.); families waiting to be reunited; and people fleeing persecution. We also need to overhaul our process for evaluating claims from refugees, asylum seekers and other displaced persons.

This four-part plan represents a comprehensive, common-sense solution to the illegal immigration challenges we face. These are not new ideas. Many of them have been offered before, but were delayed or discarded due to partisan infighting.

It’s time to try a different approach by meeting in the middle to propose workable solutions that most Americans support. Unfortunately, I’m convinced this won’t happen without new, independent leadership in Congress.

Photo Credit: Shawn Griffiths / IVN.us

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

A Tough, But Compassionate Proposal to Fix the Two-Party Immigration Disaster

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us