Skip to content
Subscribe

It's Been a Tough Week for Voter Suppression Laws And Their Creators

It's Been a Tough Week for Voter Suppression Laws And Their Creators
Published:

Over the past month, the courts have systematically begun to dismantle voter suppression laws in 4 states. Texas, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Kansas have all seen various laws designed to 'protect the ballot box' struck down as merely attempts to suppress the vote.

And this action can't be blamed on 'liberal activist judges,' considering that most of the rulings have come from some of the most conservative courts in the nation -- including the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

But it's also getting worse for one of the chief architects of these laws, with a direct democracy twist happening in Kansas.

Kansas is one of 6 states that allows for the calling of a grand jury by citizen petition -- and a remarkably small number of valid signatures are needed, only 2 percent of the total ballots cast in the most recent gubernatorial election in the filed county, plus 100 (in this case, only 860 signatures were required).

On Wednesday, county officials stated that the petition drive started by Steven X. Davis had enough signatures to begin proceedings to open a grand jury investigation into Secretary of State Kris Kobach's actions as the state's chief elections administrator.

Davis believes that a grand jury was the only way to get credible evidence as to why so many online registrations are 'lost' or 'invalidated.'

Davis claims that the Kansas Democratic Party had warned him not to use the online system when launching his voter registration drive during his run for Kansas Legislature -- and he wants to know why.

The Topeka Capital-Journal reported:

Cheyenne Davis, the [Democratic] party’s field and political director, said the party has had “dozens” of complaints from people who used the online system and later discovered their names weren’t added to voter rolls or to a list of incomplete applications. She said the online system may be faulty, but she doesn’t believe there was criminal intent.

Similarly, while the ACLU is actively suing Kobach, who is currently engaged in four separate lawsuits over his different schemes and failure to comply with lower court rulings, the group stated that they didn't perceive any criminal intent -- just overzealous enforcement of a bad law.

Either way, the grand jury will have the authority to investigate the anomalies that keep happening in Kansas, as well as why lower court rulings have been evaded or ignored.

But one thing is certain, the summer of 2016 has become nothing but headaches for those trying to implement voting restrictions.

Photo Credit: J D S / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

It's Been a Tough Week for Voter Suppression Laws And Their Creators

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us