Skip to content
Subscribe

How To Traumatize School Shooting Victims Even More

How To Traumatize School Shooting Victims Even More
Published:

After the Florida legislature voted down a bill to ban so-called "assault weapons" with victims of the Stoneman Douglas high school shooting present, Dinesh D'Souza was trending all day yesterday for tweeting a link to the story with the comment: "Worst news since their parents told them to get summer jobs."

Worst news since their parents told them to get summer jobs https://t.co/Vg3mXYvb4cFebruary 20, 2018

The media– mainstream and social– swiftly castigated D'Souza for mocking the victims of a school shooting.

He later apologized for it, admitting it was insensitive.

While it aimed at media manipulation, my tweet was insensitive to students who lost friends in a terrible tragedy. I’m truly sorryFebruary 21, 2018

But all the people who thought they were brilliant to retweet some version of "Hellooooo! They were just in a school. shooting. Maybe THAT was the worst news they've ever had!" are literally insane. Yes we know that. Dinesh D'Souza knows that. These kind of comments are even more insane than virtue signaling.

They're wrapped in smug sanctimony over the fact that you are at the absolute bare minimum standard of human decency that you think murdering a bunch of children is evil. Buddy, we all are. "Well not the guy who did this!" See you're insane. Thanks for signaling that you are more virtuous than a school shooter. This absolutely nuts. And these people are trying to imply that conservatives who support gun rights don't feel as strongly about this as they do.

Which is the actually insensitive, unfeeling thing to do with this tragedy: politicize it and make it into another way to demonize and hate half of America. I have some words unfit for print to describe how angry it makes me that people are making this tragedy about their partisan bigotry.

And anyone capable of taking just one calm moment of critical thinking about what they're reading online can tell that D'Souza wasn't mocking the students. He was mocking the political opportunists who are USING these students and their personal tragedy to push a political agenda by exploiting the strong emotional response to this tragedy and a reliable partisan wedge issue.

He's mocking the notion these shameless political opportunists are pushing– the notion that what these students have been through somehow means they now have the answers to how our society should be constituted. But they don't. They've just suffered. That doesn't make them any wiser. They're still kids. And this notion is so absurd that it absolutely should be mocked.

And it also should be mocked because it's vile. It's vile because it's manipulative. It's manipulative of the students and of the public. It's manipulative and dishonest to imply that conservatives who want to exercise their right to own rifles and resist any encroachment on that right somehow are less compassionate than you about the suffering these students have been through. And it's using these students as props in a cynical attempt to bully others into being afraid to speak up for their right to bear arms.

And while these smug liberals are tripping over themselves to bear the mantle of compassion for these students, and therefore some privileged understanding of how to constitute society, they are in fact carelessly adding to their trauma. We all know they've been through something truly horrific and evil, but the worst thing we can do to add on to that is now lean on them for leadership and make them feel like it's up to them to come up with the answers.

If they didn't already feel like the adults have failed them because this happened, what are they supposed to think about a bunch of 60 year olds now saying it's up to them– a bunch of high schoolers– to fix this for us??? This is literal insanity. They're not ready to lead society. They're kids. And they're BEING USED as props.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

How To Traumatize School Shooting Victims Even More

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us