Skip to content
Subscribe

Two-Party Brain Drain: Why The Nation's Brightest Minds are Fleeing The Parties

Two-Party Brain Drain: Why The Nation's Brightest Minds are Fleeing The Parties
Published:

In the study of migration patterns, scholars often times point to different “push” and “pull” factors that have influenced migration trends over time.

Historically, the free market structure of the United States’ economy, combined with its stable democracy has been a very strong “pull” factor that has enticed millions of families (including my own) to immigrate here from various corners of the earth.

Conversely, dysfunctional governments that have proven unable to serve their people have historically been very strong “push” factors.

“Brain drain” occurs when a country loses a significant amount of highly talented individuals due to a combination of push and pull factors.

As was previously stated, this phenomenon is formally limited to migration patterns. However, the shifting political landscape of the United States may warrant an expansion of the way we apply these terms.

It is no secret that divisiveness, tribalism, and hypocrisy pervade our political system today. While some of this is to be expected in an election year, the fact that it has endured well into 2018 is truly an aberration from previous norms.

This departure from the norm has had many impacts on society, and most of them have been unpleasant. One of the side effects stemming from the intransigence of our two parties is a brain drain, but of different sorts.

No, the brightest minds in America are not fleeing the country at an alarming rate, but they are fleeing their parties at one.

The reason why our nation’s brightest minds are fleeing the two major political parties is akin to why our ancestors left their indigenous countries. That is, the environment created by our current political system has shown that it is unable to appropriately respond to the will of the people, and this has incentivized large segments of our population to seek a political alternative.

This is not speculation, and has actually been backed by a bevy of recent data. For example, Pew Research Center reports that 39% of Americans identify as Independent, which is up from 30% in 2004. But the most useful information regarding this trend can be found when digging a little deeper into the political tend of individuals under 40.

To begin, let’s take a look at the graph above, detailing the changing dynamics of eligible voters in the United States.

As you can see, Millennials are on track to become the largest voting bloc in our country by the 2018 midterm elections. This information becomes even more compelling when you couple it with a recent study from the University of Chicago.

In the 2017 study, it was reported that  71% of individuals between 18-29 believed that a third party option was needed for our country. Additionally, a Harvard poll found that 67% of millennials are more fearful than hopeful for the future of our country.

This is important, because fear is the greatest cause of unrest in any society; and if our two-party system continues in its obdurate ways, then they run the significant risk of seeing their influence wane dramatically.

It is important to remember, however, that this does not mean anything unless these individuals actually go out and vote. That is why the record number of young voters in the recent Virginia election should alarm both parties, especially Republicans.

As this data shows, younger generations are involving themselves in politics at a younger age and have been surprisingly effective despite their youth. The overwhelming social media campaign led by high school students in the wake of the Parkland massacre exemplifies this, and it also indicates a seismic shift in our political landscape.

To any casual observer, it is blatantly clear that our two-party system is plagued by political gridlock, and the prominence of social media and the echo chambers created by it have only exacerbated these conditions.

This meteoric rise in partisanship has created a great deal of political pressure, so to speak. Political pressure is the same as any other kind of pressure in that it constantly seeks an escape valve.

What this data shows us is that the escape valve in this sense is a formidable independent party.

More and more, we are seeing independents announce their candidacy for state office. This is happening across the country in states like Colorado, Missouri, and Maryland. At this rate, it is only a matter of time before this trend spills over to the federal level.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Two-Party Brain Drain: Why The Nation's Brightest Minds are Fleeing The Parties

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us