Skip to content
Subscribe

The Two-Party Duopoly: Why America's Politics are Nastier than Europe's

The Two-Party Duopoly: Why America's Politics are Nastier than Europe's
Published:

In my experience speaking to Europeans and Canadians about our political system, they frequently demonstrate a lot of worry for us. Gone are the days of the usual cross-Atlantic holier-than-thou quipping and sniping. They’re just plain worried for us -- and, by extension, them.

Europe, no doubt, has its own bag of problems, though they try not to admit it to us Yanks. But the vitriol and mutual partisan hatred that is the new normal in American politics sets us apart. A large majority of Republicans and Democrats have very negative views of each other, and identify in their party because they hate the other one.

Studies in Canada, Germany, and the United States confirm that the mutual antipathy here is much higher. And yes, it’s quite dangerous. As Yoda said: “Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.” Not only is our political system going to remain deadlocked (and miserable) until we fix this, but history shows this threatens the fabric of the very nation.

I’ve already talked about the drivers of this growth of antipathy in Wedged, and you can learn more about it in this video by my co-author, or in this article by me. But why did the US go so far off the rails, when Canada and much of Europe seem to be ticking along with more normal levels of political friction?

One big and important difference is our party system. We have two, and most of our peers have more than two. When you have two parties, each party can identify itself as the antithesis of the other, evil party. When you have 5, it’s much harder to be anti-everyone. You need to show people a reason to vote for you more than the other 4 parties -- not just a reason to vote against the other party.

Even here in the United States, we’ve found that voting systems which encourage more party participation lead to more positive campaigns. Instant-runoff voting -- or ranked choice voting -- allows people to vote outside the two-party system without throwing their vote away. It works.

Open primaries can help, too. If winning a primary requires getting lots of people on board--not just the hardcore of a single angry party--it will deliver candidates to the general election that have broader appeal. It’s that simple.

Unfortunately, the two-party system isn’t all that interested in these kinds of voting reforms. Nobody wants to lose power. But they need to happen.

Luckily, dozens of states have adopted some form of open primaries, and ranked choice voting is just starting to pick up steam around the country. Maine even passed a ballot initiative in 2016 to use RCV as its method for electing members of Congress. Missouri just kicked off a movement to bring both reforms to the Show-Me State.

You’re reading this because you’re worried and frustrated. You may feel like there’s nothing you can do. But if you want to make a change, I encourage you to do your research and find the organizations in your state advocating for voting reform.

If you can’t find them, reach out to organizations such as the Independent Voter Project, Open Primaries, and FairVote to get help getting it off the ground yourself. Your country needs you now.

Photo Credit: Christos Georghiou / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The Two-Party Duopoly: Why America's Politics are Nastier than Europe's

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us