Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Mind Blowing: Two Separate Polls Show 11-Point Disparity in Trump's Approval

Mind Blowing: Two Separate Polls Show 11-Point Disparity in Trump's Approval

By Shawn M Griffiths

2-minute read

IVN recently reported on the fact that the current political environment is really a tale of two realities. Hyper-partisanship has gotten so bad that people perceive the world with their own truth (with a lowercase "t") and it can be difficult to discern what is and is not fact, because media outlets tend to stick to one "truth" or the other.

Take daily presidential approval polling. On Wednesday, there were two drastically different reports that came out. CNN, for example, reported that Donald Trump's polling had dropped to a new low of 35 percent. Yet at the same time, conservative-leaning news aggregator Drudge Report ran with the headline, "Trump Bump: 46% Approve." Screenshot of CNN broadcast, 4/5/17

Screenshot of Drudge Report, 4/5/17

That is no small gap in polling disparity, either. That is an 11-point difference.

Drudge Report linked to a Rasmussen Poll published Wednesday morning. CNN, on the other hand, reported on a Quinnipiac poll that released Tuesday. Now the curious thing is the disparity in the polls, because though Rasmussen is often seen as having a more right-leaning bias and there are polling agencies who historically have a more left-leaning bias, these polls are never that far apart -- certainly not 11 points.

On Wednesday, for instance, Gallup found Trump approval at 42 percent, 4 points off from Rasmussen. Economist/YouGov shows 43 percent. The latest PPP, a historically left-leaning poll, has Trump at 40 percent. So the issue may just be with Quinnipiac, except it is not alone in finding Trump at such low numbers. Investor's Business Daily/TIPP has Trump at 34 percent.

Now, many people will say, "Well we already know that presidential polling is flawed. Why does this matter?" It matters because for better or worse these polls end up driving the national political narrative, one way or another. Left-leaning news outlets will report ad nauseam on the 35 percent from Quinnipiac, while conservative-leaning sites and channels will only show the Rasmussen poll.

And then people only get the poll from the news outlet they prefer -- the news outlet they watch because it affirms their preconceived notions of things, and the reality divide continues.

After getting the 2016 election completely wrong and showing huge disparities in presidential approval, why do we continue to let these polls drive the larger, national political discussion? Isn't it time we stop putting so much faith in these polls?

What do you think?

Photo Credit: Evan El-Amin / shutterstock.com

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Mind Blowing: Two Separate Polls Show 11-Point Disparity in Trump's Approval

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us