Skip to content
Subscribe

USA Today/Pew: 53% Oppose NSA Data Collection

USA Today/Pew: 53% Oppose NSA Data Collection
Published:

Update: According to a Rasmussen survey published on Tuesday, January 21, 68 percent believe NSA phone spying will stay the same or increase. According to a

recent survey conducted by USA Today and the Pew Research Center, a slight majority of Americans oppose the collection of communication metadata -- phone and Internet data -- by the NSA and the national intelligence community. The number of Americans who support data collection has dropped to 40 percent.

This is a notable decline from 2013. In July, a similar survey found that 50 percent of survey takers supported the NSA's anti-terrorism efforts while 44 percent were opposed.

What the survey results do show is that Americans are still mostly divided on the subject. While 53 percent is a slight majority, it is important to consider the margin of error. Forty percent said they support data collection, but that still leaves a percentage of Americans who are undecided -- who are not sure what to think.

For many, it is not a simple issue. Since September 11, Americans have been willing to turn a blind eye to some programs that expand the reach of government because they take comfort in the fact that these programs are being conducted in the name of stopping terrorism. It makes them feel safe.

However, after Edward Snowden leaked classified information detailing the extent of NSA data collection and the agency's surveillance programs, the skeletons in the intelligence community's massive walk-in closet were put on display for the nation -- as well as the entire world. While domestic spying scandals are nothing new to American politics, these controversies are not so easily swept under the rug to be forgotten.

There is a real violation of civil liberties in question with these programs and while the pursuit may be in the name of the greater good, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

On Friday, President Barack Obama unveiled new reforms with a promise to Americans and the world that the U.S. would do better. While some may have been satisfied with the president's outline, it remains to be seen if any efforts at reform are actually pursued. The president, after all, promised to be the head of the most transparent administration in United States history during his 2008 inaugural address, but has since gone in the opposite direction.

Photo Credit: The New York Post

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

USA Today/Pew: 53% Oppose NSA Data Collection

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us