Skip to content
Subscribe

We Should Stop Subsidizing Political Parties

We Should Stop Subsidizing Political Parties
Published:
Subsidize Political Parties

Nowhere in our political system is power more institutionalized than in the pocketbooks of the political players. However, a little discussed, and even lesser questioned reality is that the sources from which the parties draw much of their funds are not their own, but from the taxpayers they are elected to represent.

Last year, in primary elections alone, the Republican and Democratic parties received nearly $400 million of state funds to administer their partisan primary elections across the country. This does not include the over $136 million in taxpayer funds given to each major party for their private conventions, the untold monies given to parties to hold their internal committee elections, the state administrative costs to conduct these elections, and the beneficial treatment they are given by the FEC to collect campaign funds in support of their party-backed candidates.

In all, the state-sponsorship of the red and blue teams amounts to well over a billion dollars a year.

Yet, over the last hundred years, the parties have repeatedly argued in the courtroom that they are private institutions. In fact, in 1996, 59.5 percent of Californians voted in favor of an open primary initiative, Proposition 198. The measure passed in all fifty-eight counties in California and was in place for the 1998 and 2000 primaries. The Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional on grounds that it violated qualified political parties' “private right of association.” (California Democratic Party v. Jones).

So, if they are private institutions, why do they get special privileges to fund their private elections and events with taxpayer dollars?

Whether we enjoy our fundamental right to vote in America depends on whether we have the ability to cast a “meaningful vote.” Evidenced by a 10 percent congressional approval rating and the 40 percent of Americans who now self-identify as independents, our ability to cast a “meaningful” vote has been diminished by the private organizations that have institutionalized our electoral system.

Political parties have the right to conduct elections, to endorse candidates, to elect local central committees, and to set policy agendas. But, they should not use our money to do it.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

We Should Stop Subsidizing Political Parties

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us