Skip to content
Subscribe

Yes, Sunday's Debate Was The Worst in Presidential History

Yes, Sunday's Debate Was The Worst in Presidential History
Published:

If there was ever a time when we could actually use the term ‘worst ever,’ last night’s debate definitely applies.

Sure, it was good television viewing -- you half expected one of the candidates to pull out a sword and fall on it -- but that was the whole problem with the debate in a nutshell.

It was all too focused on the recent gaffes of both candidates, the damage control that has made it worse, and the ensuing finger pointing that was at a kindergartener’s level of ‘two wrongs making a right.’

Probably the single most telling ‘editorial’ on the debate was the Washington Time’s non-scientific, user-driven poll showing that Gary Johnson was the clear winner of the debate – though he was not even on the stage.

And while all of this makes for great sound-bites and ratings, Americans want and deserve better.

Pew Research recently found that Americans are most interested in hearing about Terrorism, the Economy, Budget Deficits, Health Care, Foreign Policy, Immigration, Gun Policy, Climate Change, SCOTUS Nominations, and Abortion, in this order, from the candidates.

This is a long list. You would think that there would be something in the list that would make almost everyone happy with the outcome of the debate.

Reviewing the transcript was abysmal when ‘grading’ the debate on what Americans found important.

When ‘locker room talk’ was a more used phrase than ‘terrorism’ or ‘terrorists’ combined, it’s indicative of the overall quality of the debate.

The quality of the debate was so bad, that the following Gary Johnson quote has been tearing apart social media today, from its simple truth:

We have fallen through the looking glass. Thanks to two candidates who are each running on a platform of not being the other, we are in historically uninspiring territory.

The media has definitely become a huge part of the problem – creating a looking glass from the pages of ancient history – taking the Roman political tactic of making sure the population is happy with circuses to a new extreme.

With less than a month to go in the election season, there’s no end in sight.

Claims, counterclaims, threats, half-truths and lies – at some point we as a nation are going to have to realize the fundamental truth about how we got into this political nightmare.

It's what happens when people vote purely for political objectives with total disregard for the actual person running for office.

Photo Credit: AP Photo/John Locher

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Yes, Sunday's Debate Was The Worst in Presidential History

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us