Skip to content
Sign up free
News

69% of 501(c)(4) Groups Targeted by IRS Have Significant Political Involvement

69% of 501(c)(4) Groups Targeted by IRS Have Significant Political Involvement

By Lucas Eaves

2-minute read

The recent IRS scandal and the revelation that tea party affiliated groups had been targeted by IRS has revived suspicions that the IRS is being used for political purposes. However, when looking at more details into the practices of the IRS, it appears the reasons behind the profiling are more complex than one would think.

First, it is important to understand the type of organizations that were "targeted" by the IRS. They were all 501(c)4 organizations. This tax exempt status was created at the beginning of the 20th century to exclusively promote social welfare. Over time, however, this characterization has evolved to primarily mean promoting the common good and social welfare.

This did not matter that much until the 2010 Citizens United decision that opened the gates for unlimited spending by corporations and unions on political matters. The fact that 501(c)4 allows donors to remain anonymous has made them the perfect recipient for millions of dollars of political money.

However, the fact remains that 501(c)4 cannot primarily have a political purpose. With the IRS staff being reduced over the last few years, internal memos have encouraged agents to look for "flag words" that could indicate the organization's underlying political agenda. These flag words have included "tea party," "patriots," or "9/12" for their quite obvious political connotations.

While such a strategy raises concerns over political profiling, the fact is that 69 percent of the flagged groups were found to have a significant political involvement. But, despite being involved in political campaigns, 36.5 percent of the organization were granted a tax exempt status, 54 percent are still under review. Only 1 organization has been denied the 501(c)4 status.

Americans will never find out if the IRS scandal's was really about: political targeting or shortcuts made by an understaffed agency. Regardless of the truth, the IRS' history of being used by presidents of both sides for political purposes will forever stain the recent revelations.

The following infographic was provided by  Top Accounting Degrees.org. Credit: TopAccountingDegrees.org

irs scandal
Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

69% of 501(c)(4) Groups Targeted by IRS Have Significant Political Involvement

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us