Skip to content
Sign up free
News

A Response to Ammiano and the Domestic Workers' Rights Bill

A Response to Ammiano and the Domestic Workers' Rights Bill

By Raul Carranza

2-minute read

A Response to Asm. Ammiano and the Domestic Workers Rights Bill

Credit: Gordon Swanson / Shutterstock.com

Two weeks ago, Rep. Tom Ammiano responded to my article on Assembly Bill 241. I would like to thank him for taking the time to respond. This is exactly what our country needs, meaningful dialogue between representatives and everyday citizens. Below is my response.

My opposition to Ammiano's bill is a matter practicality rather than philosophical. I do not dispute that there's a very real problem with the current working conditions of domestic workers. I do not want caregivers to be tired and overworked. It's unsafe and dangerous to the health of those they care for, including myself. One small slip up while caring for me could mean a trip to the hospital or even death.

It is in my best interest to make sure that my caregivers are treated well. Most, if not all, of the disabled community would pay them $30/hour with overtime plus room and board along with opportunities to get graduate degrees and advance their careers -- fair compensation for their great work. Unfortunately, most people with disabilities can barely afford to maintain themselves.

As I said in my last article, most people with disabilities don't have much money. In 2009, 19.2 percent of disabled Californians lived below the poverty line ($10,890) and 28.6 percent had incomes between $10,890 and $21,671. Only 34.8 percent make at least $32,670 a year. For someone paying $10/hr to a caregiver for 40 hours a week, paying a simple four hours of overtime means an extra $60 a week.

That's gas money, groceries or medicine. While Ammiano's bill does make an exception for low-income people eligible for IHSS, 80 percent of people with disabilities remain excluded from the service.

The IHSS monthly income limit is $870 for an individual ($10,440/year), which is still below the poverty level.

One last thing I'd like to address. Ammiano says that I suggested that $2.7 million in campaign funds were donated specifically to pass this bill. At first I was puzzled because I don't remember saying that, so I went back and reread my article. I did say that. I don't know why I did and I apologize.

The point I was trying to make was that organizations who support the bill have donated $2.7 million in campaign funds to a number of representatives, including Ammiano. 44 out of 45 representatives who voted for the bill received more money from organizations that support the bill than those who oppose it, according to Maplight.

This is a complex issue, but I do not think AB 241 is the solution. Instead, I suggest expanding the current IHSS program to cover middle class disabled Californians while simultaneously raising workers' wages and ensuring current beneficiaries don't experience a reduction in services. I admit, such a bill would not be easy to pass, but it should not be impossible.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

A Response to Ammiano and the Domestic Workers' Rights Bill

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us