Skip to content
Subscribe

Analysis: Popular Oakland Ranked Choice Voting System Used to Decide City's Next Mayor

On Tuesday, Oakland, CA used ranked choice voting (RCV) in special elections for mayor and City Council District 2 – marking Oakland’s 5th mayoral election using RCV. A 2024 poll found that 77% of Oakland voters are satisfied with the election method. 

Analysis: Popular Oakland Ranked Choice Voting System Used to Decide City's Next Mayor
Photo by Brian Jin on Unsplash.
Published:

Editor's Note: This analysis originally published on FairVote's website and has been republished on IVN with permission from the organization.

On Tuesday, Oakland, CA used ranked choice voting (RCV) in special elections for mayor and City Council District 2 – marking Oakland’s 5th mayoral election using RCV. A 2024 poll found that 77% of Oakland voters are satisfied with the election method, and 92% of Bay Area voters say they understand it well or somewhat well. The San Francisco Chronicle has called the mayoral election for former congresswoman Barbara Lee, and the city council race for Charlene Wang.

In the mayoral election, candidates included Lee, former Oakland City Councilmember Loren Taylor, Mindy Pechenuk, Elizabeth Swaney, and five others. Lee and Taylor were viewed as frontrunners, raising the most money and receiving the most notable endorsements.

In unofficial election results released Friday, April 18, Barbara Lee leads the race for mayor, with 50.0% of first choices and 52.7% of votes in an RCV count. Loren Taylor is in second, with 45.0% of first choices and 47.3% of votes in the RCV count. In addition to the Chronicle, Decision Desk HQ has called the election for Lee.

Like most cities that use RCV, Oakland releases its preliminary RCV results on election night – on the same timeline as other results. Since California counts mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day, a large number of ballots were counted after Election Day and released earlier today. About 300 more mail-in ballots are expected to be cured and counted in the race.

Notably, although mayoral candidate Tyron Jordan withdrew before election day, his name still appeared on the ballot. He received 1.1% of first choices, the third-most in the race. In a single-choice election, any votes for a withdrawn candidate would be “wasted.” However, with RCV, a voter who ranked a withdrawn candidate like Jordan first can have their vote count for a second choice.

Using the current cast vote record – an anonymized record of all ballots cast – we see that 85% of voters who ranked Jordan first ranked a second choice. In total, 85% of voters who did not rank Lee or Taylor first ranked at least one backup choice, showing how voters can use the ranked ballot to have greater say and better express their preferences in a crowded race.

61% of all voters ranked at least two candidates in the mayoral race, with Lee and Taylor voters less likely to rank multiple candidates. This matches previous evidence showing that voters rank when it matters – supporters of frontrunning candidates may be less likely to rank multiple choices, as they know their favorite is likely to make it to the final round of counting. In another sign of voters’ effective use of the ranked ballot, 99.6% of all ballots cast in the mayoral race were valid.

In the City Council District 2 race, the six candidates were Wang, Reverend Kenneth Anderson, Harold Lowe, Kanitha Matoury, Kara Murray-Badal, and Paula Thomas. Wang and Murray-Badal raised the most money and received the most prominent endorsements.

Charlene Wang was declared the winner by the Chronicle. In unofficial results, Wang leads with 46.9% of first choices and 60% of votes in the RCV count. Murray-Badal has 33.6% of first choices and 40.6% of votes in the RCV count.

75% of voters who did not rank Wang or Murray-Badal first ranked at least one backup choice. 72% of all voters ranked at least two candidates in the race.

The Oakland special elections show how local organizations and candidates have embraced the opportunity to rank multiple candidates on their ballot. Barbara Lee encouraged voters to rank multiple candidates for mayor. Loren Taylor released a video with fellow candidate Elizabeth Swaney encouraging Oakland residents to vote, with Swaney encouraging voters to support multiple candidates in her accompanying post. The Alameda Labor Council and other labor or advocacy groups provided ranked endorsements for the City Council race.

Visit CalRCV today to help bring ranked choice voting to your California community, or find an RCV group in your state if you live elsewhere in the U.S.

This analysis of the Oakland mayoral election was last updated on April 18, 2025.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Analysis: Popular Oakland Ranked Choice Voting System Used to Decide City's Next Mayor

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us