Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Another Chance for California NCLB Waiver Complicated by Local Efforts

Another Chance for California NCLB Waiver Complicated by Local Efforts

By Michael Higham

2-minute read

Credit: 360-edu.com

EdSource Interview Reveals Another Chance for California NCLB Waiver

The relationship between California and the federal government in terms of education policy has been tense. The U.S. Department of Education issues waivers from No Child Left Behind sanctions to some states and while California has made several attempts, it has never been successful.

EdSource interviewed U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan on Wednesday. Duncan stated he is still open to a California NCLB waiver. However, a collective effort from several individual school districts in California for a waiver has complicated matters.

What's known as CORE, or California Office to Reform Education, underwent an nontraditional application after the state was recently denied. CORE's application is currently under federal review, but if CORE's waiver is approved, a possible state waiver would trump that.

Sec. Duncan addresses the possible conflict between the two NCLB waiver efforts:

I think anything’s possible, we haven’t worked through sort of all the permutations and ramifications there, but right now, again, folks are going back and forth with the CORE districts, we’ll see where that nets out and we remain ready to talk and open for business if the state wants to come in itself.

The NCLB law applies sanctions to states if certain educational goals are not met by 2014. Sanctions include limitations on Title I funding for low-income students and federal intervention in low-performing schools.

CORE wishes to avoid those sanctions since the state has never succeeded in obtaining an NCLB waiver. Duncan says it could be too late for the state to obtain a waiver before the beginning of the 2014 school year.

California Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson has openly criticized the waiver system in the past. He has insisted that California's current student performance accountability system is sufficient for purposes of an NCLB waiver. The state currently uses the Academic Performance Index (API) to rate student achievement in each school and district.

Reforming teacher evaluations has been at the heart of disagreements with past California NCLB waiver applications. Federal feedback insisted on a higher degree of standardized test scores to tie into teacher evaluations. CORE wants to tie testing performance into evaluations, putting the state education department and CORE at odds.

The U.S. Department of Education has granted waivers on the basis that states can provide alternative accountability and performance goals. The department insists on certain types of reforms to take place before approving waivers. Currently, 34 states have been granted waivers and 11 are still under review.

Although No Child Left Behind expired in 2007, the lack of an update or replacement law means it stays in place. A revision to NCLB or new law is not expected until 2015 as efforts from federal officials have been minimal.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Another Chance for California NCLB Waiver Complicated by Local Efforts

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us