Skip to content
Sign up free
News

At the Michigan Capitol, Bipartisanship is a Buzzword

At the Michigan Capitol, Bipartisanship is a Buzzword

By Ryan McLain

2-minute read

WikiMediaCommons

WikiCommons

In 2010, Michigan was one of the many states to go red in the mid-term elections. This 96th Congress of Michigan was a hotbed of disagreement that created a plethora of national spotlight worthy laws: the "Right-to-Work" legislation that emerged during the lame duck session, the Emergency Financial Manager program, and the 4-year welfare limit, just to name a few. Following these controversies, the state has felt more divided than ever.

In the November elections, the Republican majority in both houses, while slimmed, was maintained.  Despite the recent history of divisiveness and a single-party controlled government, bipartisanship has been a keyword in the state. On the first day of the 97th Congress, both party leaders have made offers of good faith in hopes of a new start.

For the Democrats, this offer was through the voting for the reappointment of House Speaker Jase Bolger. It has been a long standing tradition in Michigan for the minority party to do so unanimously. However, after the "Right-to-Work" bill was passed, the party members talked of breaking the tradition in protest. When it came to voting, only two representatives followed through with this action, resulting in a count of 107-2.

Speaking with the media after the nomination, House Democrat leader Rep. Tim Greimel said:

“It was a very difficult last term – particularly the lame duck portion of that term. And we have been very concerned about the extreme agenda that the Republicans have pushed. It’s clearly the most extreme agenda in the state’s history. But we also recognize that we have an opportunity here with a new term to show our respect for the institution and for the history of this institution by abiding by longstanding practice. And hopefully by extending this olive branch of symbolic bipartisanship, we can find opportunities and occasions when the two parties can find common ground. And that’s what the people of this state deserve – for the parties to do everything we can to find common ground to move this state forward and find solutions to the very real challenges we’re all facing.”

The sentiment was shared by the Speaker during his acceptance speech:

"Disagreeing with someone on a single issue should not taint the discussion of the next issue, or the resolve to deliver results for Michigan. We must seek compromise and improve working relationships with people who disagree on issues or who belong to different political parties... The history of this legislature has not yet been written. Each of us, by working together, can have a positive impact on what happens for the next two years and well into the future."

While it will likely be a long, disagreeable road ahead, the words by both sides seem to have a sense of flexibility and legitimacy. After the turbulent 96th Michigan State Legislature and a "do nothing" 112th Congress that was plagued by partisanship, any signs of compromise are warmly welcome.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

At the Michigan Capitol, Bipartisanship is a Buzzword

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us