Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Blind Sponsors: Paralympians Handicapped by Discrimination

Blind Sponsors: Paralympians Handicapped by Discrimination

By JJ Wellings

3-minute read

Disability discrimination is a relic. Or is it? Is it discrimination if an able-bodied person is paid 20 times that of a disabled person? Is it discrimination if an able-bodied person is paid their bonus every time they make their target but a disabled person only gets it once?

A reasonable person can see these are rhetorical questions. Of course disabled people should be paid and treated the same as able-bodied people. So, why are there still pockets of disparity in our modern world?

The answer: it is all nonsense. We live in a country that purports to be founded on each person's freedom to be who they are, to live without persecution and receive equal treatment. A foundation where religion is a personal choice but is unable to influence the law and governance of the people. Yet segregation by color still existed within some people's lifetimes and people hate others because of their religion.

With this background it’s no surprise that some people with disabilities not only have to overcome more than an able-bodied person to be on a level footing, they still get less recompense. What if one man had surpassed the abilities of 99.9% of the able-bodied population and still was paid less than his able-bodied counterparts? That would be a travesty.

Sadly, that travesty exists.

David Brown can run 100m in 10.92 seconds. He does this despite being completely blind. Losing his sight at the age of 6, Brown’s vision was completely gone by 13. It was at that time that David won an essay competition that changed the course of his life. The prize was to go to the Beijing Olympics to watch the Paralympics. There he experienced 2-time Olympic trialist, Jerome Avery, running as a guide for a blind sprinter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFATTuMEk8A

Blessed with natural raw power he decided to transfer those memories and chart his own course on the track himself. He soon found himself under the gaze of the USA Paralympic coaches. Before too long, the sighted guides running with him couldn’t keep up and were slowing him down. They had to turn to the best guide around, Jerome Avery, an Olympic-level sprinter in his own right. Avery was the only man around who could run faster than Brown.

The challenge does not end there. Avery has to talk and match his gait at breakneck speeds. Soon after, Team BrAvery, as they have become known, recorded the fastest time ever for 100m for any totally blind athlete -- 10.92 seconds. Let that sink in.

If Brown was racing Tyson Gay or Usain Bolt he would be about a second behind. A big margin in sprinting terms, but not in the layman's. Just imagine Gay or Bolt crossing the line, and one second later Brown would burst across. A staggering achievement considering his blindness.

Brown has had to train and compete with gear that is below Olympic standards. He uses blown out running spikes.

It’s true that Nike sponsors the US Track and Field team, but that is largely for uniforms.

Dick’s Sporting Goods supports USA athletes providing some 20 hours a week of work at their stores. The folks at the Olympic Training Center in Chula Vista, California provide housing and food through the USOC. But the hardware of the job, like shoes and spikes, are dealt with through individual contracts.

This is where you come in.

Team BrAvery isn’t asking sponsors for million-dollar contracts. Although it would be more deserved than most. They just want the hardware to perform and money to pay their travel and expenses.

The US sports retail market is a roughly $63 billion business. Team BrAvery was struggling to even get suitable equipment. Their requirements are not unreasonable.

The only brand to step up so far is Adidas, who have supplied them with full sets of competitive equipment for all their sponsored athletes.

Discrimination takes many forms and financial is one of them. Brown and Avery receive not even a twentieth of what an able-bodied athlete does in prize money, fewer bonuses than able-bodied athletes, and are not as commercially attractive to the corporate sponsors as  able-bodied ones.

David Brown deserves the opportunity to compete with the best equipment at the highest level. How is this the case where a man overcomes all odds with utter determination and great team work with Avery? Are these not the virtues national athletic bodies should be rewarding? Is this not the marketing gold for corporate America?

David Brown is blind. Seems society is as well.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Blind Sponsors: Paralympians Handicapped by Discrimination

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us