Skip to content
Subscribe

California Legislature Passes Most Sweeping Privacy Protection in Country

California Legislature Passes Most Sweeping Privacy Protection in Country
Published:

AB 375, the California Consumer Privacy Act bill, was unanimously passed by the California State Senate 36-0 and the California Assembly 69-0. The bill is expected to be signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown and will go into effect in 2020.

The action staves off a bruising campaign involving tech giants Google, Verizon, AT&T and Facebook who were prepared to spend by some accounts $100 million to defeat the privacy initiative that by all accounts, gives consumers more control over the collecting and sharing of their data.

California Consumer Privacy Act Tenets

The initiative received 625,000 signatures, almost twice the number required for an initiative to be included on the California ballot.

Three principles served as the basis of the ballot initiative:

  1. The right to know what personal information is being collected;
  2. The right to know what personal information is being sold and/or shared with third parties as well as the identity of those third parties; and
  3. The right to request that their personal information no longer be sold (i.e., the right to opt out).

In addition to the consumer rights above, businesses would be required to provide notice through their privacy policy regarding whether personal data is sold and instructions for opting out of the selling or sharing of this data.

Legislature Flexibility

One of the dynamics with the legislature passing the bill is it brings more flexibility to change the bill. Had it gone to the voters in November, it would have taken another initiative to amend any portion of the law. Sen. Joel Anderson of San Diego noted this, "technologies change and we need the flexibility to change with the industry. This bill is a great path because it allows flexibility that the initiative doesn't provide."

Cynics may argue that the big tech companies of today are the winners, because now they can wield control of the legislative process and pull back protections before the bill goes into effect in 2020.

Optimists may celebrate the uncharacteristically bipartisan recognition of California's constitutional protection of the individual right to privacy, which was unanimously codified by legislators from both sides of the aisle.

OK Google, how will this legislation affect our history?

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California Legislature Passes Most Sweeping Privacy Protection in Country

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us