Skip to content
Sign up free
News

California legislators should focus on the deficit, not costly government-run healthcare

California legislators should focus on the deficit, not costly government-run healthcare

By Chelene Nightingale

2-minute read

“If you get breast cancer, I’m sorry honey; you have less chance of survival than before this bill passed.” Those words were declared by Michigan Congressman Mike Rogers six months ago during his opening statements regarding health care reform.

Since Mr. Roger’s statement, Republican Scott Brown won a Massachusetts special election to fill Ted Kennedy’s vacant seat.  Americans across the nation focused on the campaign in hopes that Brown would win in order to break the democrat majority needed to pass Obamacare.  Voters sent a clear message echoed by mainstream polls that the majority of Americans oppose government controlled healthcare.

Confirming the majority sentiment, Virginia Democrat, state Senator Phillip Puckett stated, “I don't believe someone should be forced to buy something they don't want to…It’s un-American.  And it might be unconstitutional."  Senator Puckett joined other state senators earlier this week to pass three bills making it illegal to enforce mandatory healthcare onto Virginia residents.

Apparently, the California Senate Appropriations Committee does not believe universal healthcare is un-American since they passed SB 810 earlier this week.  If signed into law, the state government-controlled bill would cost California over $200 billion.

Currently, California faces a $20 billion deficit and a record 12% plus unemployment rate.  As businesses leave the Golden State in record numbers and residents struggle to pay their mortgages, the state legislature seems more concerned with abolishing free parking than with the exorbitant cost of their proposed healthcare plan.  Equally disturbing is the fact that the state legislature is definitely out of touch with their constituents according to the latest Field Poll.  7 out of 10 Californians disapproved of how the federal government handled the healthcare issue.  Although healthcare is crucial to every citizen, no one wants to gamble with their own lives while being forced to pay for an experiment.

Individual choice is the American way!  Freedom is the main principle our nation was founded upon.  Indeed our healthcare system needs reforming but through the private sector and personal choices.  Health prevention and natural medicine resources are readily available and cost efficient.  In fact, educational health expos are common in California.

Instead of playing medical professionals, our elected officials should spend more time listening to voters and reducing our state deficit. Perhaps what is truly in order is a part time legislature to cure an out-of-touch state government.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California legislators should focus on the deficit, not costly government-run healthcare

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us