Skip to content
Sign up free
News

California School District Sues College Board over AP Test Invalidation

California School District Sues College Board over AP Test Invalidation

By Rachel Klein

2-minute read

California AP controversy

Stephen Coburn / shutterstock.com

Students, including many recent graduates, from Mills High School had hundreds of AP tests invalidated after a student tip to the College Board prompted the discovery of seating irregularities during exams.

According to College Board standards, test-takers must be separated from each other by at least five feet and cannot face each other. Administrators acknowledged the violations, citing a lack of space in the school.

While the College Board emphasized the fact that they found no evidence of cheating or other student misconduct, they insist that tests must be retaken and that previously awarded scores cannot be considered valid., a section on exam security states that "hen testing irregularities occur, the College Board may decline to score the exams of one or more students and it may cancel the scores of one or more students...and  do so whether or not the affected students caused the testing irregularities, benefited from them, or engaged in misconduct."

In the 2012-2013 AP Coordinator Manual

Students, parents, and teachers turned to the Internet to share the AP controversy, and the school district has sued the College Board and the Educational Testing Service for the scoring and reporting of exams to 2013 graduates' respective colleges.

Mills is not the first school to experience score invalidation, and legal action in similar situations has not always proved successful.

In 2008, another California high school attempted -- but failed -- to obtain a temporary restraining order against the ETS that would have blocked the retesting of almost 300 students. In that AP controversy, alleged irregularities included improper seating.

The controversy highlights the increasingly consumer-oriented nature of higher education. Most students and parents are upset because they paid for a product -- their AP courses, tests, and scores -- that would fulfill the specific function of obtaining college credits.

While they feel they've been denied an appropriate return on their investment, the College Board states its terms and conditions plainly and repeatedly in the coordinator manual:

"In no event shall the College Board...be responsible for students’, test administration personnel’s or schools’ failure to comply with the AP test security and test administration policies and procedures."

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California School District Sues College Board over AP Test Invalidation

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us