Skip to content
Sign up free
News

California Schools Under Pressure From New Funding Accountability

California Schools Under Pressure From New Funding Accountability

By Michael Abrams

2-minute read

Credit: newamericamedia.org

California Schools Under Pressure From New Funding Accountability

This year, Governor Jerry Brown championed a breakthrough in the way California schools will be funded for the next eight years. Along with the 2013-2014 budget, he signed a local control funding formula (LCFF) that directed more funds to districts with a higher proportion of disadvantaged students (low-income or English-learners).

In the funding formula, local districts would have the freedom to spend the money as they fit. Accountability measures are also included in the midst of local control, which may be putting a strain on districts early in the formula's implementation.

State Superintendent Tom Torlakson and State Controller John Chiang will have to create the policies and standards for how local districts adopt budgets. That deadline is January 1 of next year.

There will also be new regulations on how districts spend money in relation to its population of disadvantaged students by January 31 of next year.

The State Board of Education will have to make changes to the academic performance index (API), the state's measurement of student success. API must now track the progress of subgroups of demographics, including foster care students. This needs to be done by January 30, 2014.

School districts will need to create annual plans, alongside parent groups, on how it will spend its money. This also relies on the state education board on creating a template for districts by March of next year.

Lastly, the State Board of Education needs to evaluate the results of LCFF by creating a rubric for tracking accountability measures. From SI&A Cabinet Report:

"A deadline of Oct. 31, 2015 for adopting an evaluation rubric that provides a “holistic multidimensional assessment” of how a  has done to meet the new accountability mandates. The rubric would also be used to help the state and county offices with intervention if needed for those districts that are not meeting their goals."

The new funding formula was intended to untie the hands of schools to spend money on what is important to the school. However, it looks as if regulations the Legislature called for in the budget process are creating more education bureaucracy. But again, if the state gives districts money without specific spending mandates, then there has to be some way to keep districts accountable.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California Schools Under Pressure From New Funding Accountability

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us