Skip to content
Sign up free
News

California's 33% renewable energy goal by 2020 is not realistic

California's 33% renewable energy goal by 2020 is not realistic

By Bob Morris

2-minute read

A law in April upped California's renewable energy goals by 2020 to 33% from 20%, a far more ambitious goal than any other state is attempting. But, while a renewable energy economy is a laudable goal, it seems doubtful that California will actually be able to achieve it. Or if it does, it will be through smoke and mirrors gambits.

PG&E is buying Renewable Energy Credits from wind farms in Canada to help them achieve their renewable goals in California even though that power will never be used within the state. But, an accounting transaction noting an investment in a foreign company does not cut emissions or provide renewable energy for Californians. Somewhat bizarrely, PG&E is just buying "green attributes" from the wind farms, not power and capacity, because they immediately sell the power and capacity back to them. Gosh, this seems almost as opaque as Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. Inquiring minds want to know how such transactions genuinely aid California moving to renewables.

If California genuinely wants to go to renewables, it must cease the tired and hypocritical game of piously banning coal plants within the state while still importing massive amounts of coal energy from Nevada, Arizona, and elsewhere. Not only does the coal pollute other states while allowing California to pretend it is using clean energy, sending the power along hundreds of miles of transmission lines wastes energy and puts extra load on the grid. Instead, a worthy goal would be to have California generate as much of its power internally, close to where it is used, and also to 'fess up to its dirty little coal addiction.

So then, let's just build lots of solar and wind farms and be done with it, right? Well, as of 2009, solar contributed 0.3% of California's power (that's not a misprint) while wind was 2.7%. Ramping that up to meet the 2020 goal is simply not feasible. It would require that tens of thousands of wind turbines be installed each year until then. Plus, the existing grid simply cannot handle that much intermittent power gracefully, if at all, and will need to be upgraded.

If you think tens of thousands of wind turbines plus several massive solar projects a year will be green-lighted without delay, think again. IHS Emerging Point Research predicts about 36% of contracted generation will fail to come online after 2015. The reasons include funding shortfalls, regulatory hurdles, environmental challenges, NIMBYs, and more.

Governor Jerry Brown is pushing hard for renewables but is definitely sending a mixed message when he simultaneously says the process will be democratic and not top-down, but then threatens to crush renewables opponents. Make up your mind, Mr. Governor, because those in smaller towns in desert areas are starting to feel steamrolled by the relentless push for fast-track development.

California's renewable energy goals may be politically popular, but it's difficult to see how they can be implemented by 2020.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California's 33% renewable energy goal by 2020 is not realistic

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us