Skip to content
Sign up free
News

How Democracy Won in 2016

How Democracy Won in 2016

By Shawn M Griffiths

3-minute read

I know what you are thinking. How could the democratic process have possibly won in 2016? If anything, the 2016 elections showed just how much control two private political corporations -- the Republican and Democratic Parties -- have over elections. And you are right. It did.

However, 2016 proved something else: Voters, fed up with the status quo, can make a difference.

When it comes to elections in the U.S., the two major parties are practically omnipotent. From deciding which voters can participate in the primary election process, to controlling which candidates get to be in presidential debates, to the two-sided narrative we get in the mainstream media, the Republican and Democratic Parties have manufactured a two-party system that makes it almost impossible for alternative voices and ideas to be heard and compete.

ALSO READ: Why Political Parties Control Elections

Yet, more and more people are waking up to this reality, and realizing that the current system doesn't serve voters, first. It puts the interests of two private corporations first.

Consider for a moment what happened this year:

Throughout the year, it was not uncommon to see frustrated voters write or hear people talk about how disenchanted and disenfranchised they felt about the election. There are many voters who feel like their vote doesn't count or doesn’t matter in the end.

Much of it is a systemic problem -- a systemic problem that was largely exposed during the 2016 election cycle. For the first time, many voters were enlightened to the inner workings of the DNC and RNC, and how rules and procedures are changed or manipulated to favor the party-anointed candidate.

READ MORE: From Superdelegates to Brokered Conventions, Both Parties Really Don’t Care What Voters Think

Voters learned about superdelegates, brokered conventions, voter purges, confusing and impractical voter registration rules, restrictive primary election laws, and bipartisan debate rules that were crafted by party bosses to maintain exclusive control over the democratic process.

But to the voters who think their vote doesn't matter, you are wrong. More Americans than ever are tired of establishment politics. They want change, and when the opportunity is presented to them, they will vote for that change and can make a difference.

Voters outside the two major parties cannot be marginalized. The growing dissatisfaction with the duopolistic status quo can no longer be ignored. The movement to make elections more representative and more accountable to voters is growing fast, and it is shaking up political systems across the country.

On the surface, 2016 may not seem like a win for democracy for some, but look deeper. Voters made a difference. They challenged the political establishment and in many instances, won. Democracy was a big winner this year.

Photo Credit: Darya Andrievskaya / shutterstock.com

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

How Democracy Won in 2016

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us