Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Elections Have Consequences: Cheating Fails, but Does Reality Win?

Elections Have Consequences: Cheating Fails, but Does Reality Win?

By William Boardman

3-minute read

Elections Have Consequences. Election 2012 probably doesn’t prove anything. But it provides some evidence for the hopeful proposition that: even when the game is rigged, the cheaters lose:

  • MONEY.  Even though the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision allowed gross amounts of money (almost $6 billion) from known and unknown donors to distort the process, few elections near the top of the ballot appear to have been bought.  But the down-ballot races may be most of the iceberg.

Big money may not have overwhelmed the electoral system in 2012, but that’s far from saying big money doesn’t control too much of government and too many public officials.

  • PROCESS.  Even though hyper-partisan Republican legislators, election officials, and outside groups made a concerted effort by a variety of means to suppress voting by likely Democratic-leaning constituencies, there was sufficient pushback from the courts, the Justice Department, and professional election officials to allow the democratic process to function pretty well.

Something like a fair and open election seems to have taken place in 2012, but the people who attacked the process mostly remain in power.  Their gerrymandered Congressional districts will remain in place till the next census, in 2020. Unless these people begin to re-think their beliefs, they will continue to have strong motivation to skew the electorate in any way they can, and they will likely try.

Perceiving Reality Remains a National Challenge

The results of Election 2012 may also support a second hopeful proposition that: denying reality is not as good a path to political victory as it used to be.

Maybe.  There are portents, some straws in the wind:

  • OBSTRUCTIONISM. Republicans in Congress (and out) preferred to perpetuate economic suffering rather than risking the perception that the President had any success. Enough of a less than grateful nation saw through the tactic to prevent it from succeeding.
  • CLIMATE.  Nobody talked about the climate, and nobody did anything about it, either.  Then Hurricane Sandy helped the President win re-election.  The big money still backs denial and continued planetary destruction.
  • WOMEN.  Maybe it’s not God’s will when rape produces pregnancy.  Candidates who believed it was ended up losing races they could have won.  That was the will of the electorate.
  • MARRIAGE.  The idea that two people who want to get married should have that right in modern America was endorsed by electorates for the first time.  False gender stereotypes and appeals to a false notion of “traditional marriage” lost some of their power to cloud people’s minds.
  • MARIJUANA.  “Reefer Madness” propaganda failed to persuade voters in two states.  The dishonesty and stupidity of the “war on drugs” is becoming obvious to a majority of Americans.  Does that majority include the President yet?
  • RACE.  Years of overt and covert racism failed to prevent the President’s re-election.  Is the country post-racial yet?  Hardly.  But people who agree with what Bill O’Reilly means when he says, “it’s not a traditional America anymore,” are part of a slowly contracting minority

Some scales have fallen from some eyes, but the country still suffers from many chronic delusions.  Probably the most dangerous is the near hysterical fear of Iran having a nuclear weapon.  We also remain deluded about the efficacy of nuclear weapons generally, as well as the rationality of nuclear power.  And we still imagine that we’re so exceptional that we can – and should – work our will anywhere we want in the world.  Even if we could, it wouldn’t be a good idea.

The totality of the election was not a victory so much as an escape from defeat.  But there were enough smaller, real victories across the country to make the larger victory seem almost possible again. Elections Have Consequences.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Elections Have Consequences: Cheating Fails, but Does Reality Win?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us